There are many problems that confronts evolutionary theory ,odds are one that cant be explained to be believable.
I talk about the odds against logic, there are over 100 amino acids, but only 20 are needed for life’s proteins.they come in two shapes: Some of the molecules are “right-handed and others are left handed .IF they formed at a random process of a organic soup, it seems its most likely that half would be right handed and half left handed.
There is no known reason why either shape should be preferred in living things. Yet, of the 20 amino acids producing life’s proteins,
all are left-handed ,what are the odds?
How can thus be logically explained other by designed that only the specifically required kinds would be united in the soup for life to exist.
Again I speak of odds
,Probability that the correct amino acids would come together to form a protein molecule.Its liken to big thoroughly mixed pile gobbyde goop of red beans and white beans containing equal numbers now in this pile are over 100 different varieties of beans. Now, if you plunged a scoop into this pile, what do you think you would get? To get the beans that represent the basic components of a protein, you would have to scoop up
ONLY red ones no white ones at all and when the perfect conditions exist you only have 1 chance to get this right forever,not only this but your scoop must contain only 20 varieties of the red beans, and each one must be in a specific, preassigned place in the scoop.
In the scientific world of protein, a single mistake in any one of these requirements would cause the protein that is produced to fail to function properly.
Would any amount of stirring and scooping in this hypothetical bean pile have given the right combination?
No, again I ask what are the odds? Then how would it have been possible in the hypothetical organic soup?
The proteins needed for life have very complex molecules. What is the chance of even a simple protein molecule forming at random in an organic soup? the odds are
one in 10113 (1 followed by 113 zeros) dismissed by mathematicians as never happening for all eternity .An idea of the odds, or probability, involved is seen in the fact that the number 10113 is larger than the estimated total number of all the atoms in the universe.
Folks I didnt make these odds up ,this is evolutionists acknowledge it to be one in 10113
Evolution is a fact
Evolutionists are you aware that evolution is mathematically impossible? | Yahoo Answers
Some proteins serve as structural materials and others as enzymes. The latter speed up needed chemical reactions in the cell. Without such help, the cell would die. Not just a few, but 2,000 proteins serving as enzymes are needed for the cell’s activity. What are the chances of obtaining all of these at random?
Now look at nucleotides, the structural units of DNA, which bears the genetic code. Five histones are involved in DNA histones are thought to be involved in governing the activity of genes. The chance of forming even the simplest of these histones is said to be 1 in 20100—how large are these odds?
Larger than the total of all the atoms in all the stars and galaxies visible in the largest astronomical telescopes THAT EXIST.
want more proof Jehovah GOD was behind this?
How about the origin of the complete genetic code a requirement for cell reproduction. The old puzzle of the chicken or the egg rears its head relative to proteins and DNA proteins depend on DNA for their formation. But DNA cannot form without preexisting protein,this create a paradox which came first,the protein or the DNA? To accept evolutionists theory the answer must be they developed in parallel.In effect, the chicken’ and ‘the egg’ must have evolved simultaneously, neither one coming from the other.
Evolutionary theory attempts to eliminate the need for the impossible to be accomplished in one blow by espousing a step-by-step process by which natural selection could do its work gradually. However, without the genetic code to begin reproduction, there can be no material for natural selection to select.
The process has had forever in theory to get it right the problem is it would take longer than FOREVER to get it right.
Somewhere along forever of time the primitive cell had to devise something that revolutionized life on earth photosynthesis.This process, by which plants take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen.
Biologist F. W. Went - Google Search
Biologist F. W. Went states, “a process that no one has yet been able to reproduce in a test tube.”22 Yet, by chance, a tiny simple cell is thought to have originated it.Seems someone knew we were coming needing oxygen.
This process of photosynthesis turned an atmosphere that contained no free oxygen into one in which one molecule out of every five is oxygen. As a result, animals could breathe oxygen and live, and an ozone layer could form to protect all life from the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation but Im to believe this all was random chance.
Intelligence must somehow have been involved in bringing life into existence,
If a spontaneous beginning for life is to be accepted as scientific fact, it should be established by the scientific method. This has been described as follows:
"Observe what happens; based on those observations, form a theory as to what may be true; test the theory by further observations and by experiments; and watch to see if the predictions based on the theory are fulfilled"
In an attempt to apply the scientific method, it has not been possible to observe the spontaneous generation of life. There is no evidence that it is happening now, and of course no human observer was around when evolutionists say it was happening. No theory concerning it has been verified by observation. Laboratory experiments have failed to repeat it. Predictions based on the theory have not been fulfilled. With such an inability to apply the scientific method, is it honest science to elevate such a theory to the level of fact?
Professor Wald of Harvard University
Professor Wald of Harvard University - Google Search
“to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible.”
But what does this proponent of evolution actually believe? He answers: “Yet here we are—as a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation
Does that sound like objective science?
I think the logical intelligence of the human mind deep down inside subconsciously
believe the existence of a supreme being ,but because conditions are so horrible ,death ,sickness .pandemics ,natural disasters faith is demised in a loving GOD.
Therefore theories come forth to explain how we came to be excluding a GOD as the first cause.
Bur Jehovah GOD has a purpose for man and this earth
click this link to explore the scriptures :
https://www.jw.org/en/library/books/happy-life/what-was-gods-original-purpose-for-man/
