it does not mean that humans are a product of evolution or Einstein's variation of God.
Well, it does show even more how the difference isn't as great as some would like. Other evidence shows that the evolution happened.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
it does not mean that humans are a product of evolution or Einstein's variation of God.
No, the endless evidence that supports evolution and only evolution does mean that humans are a product of evolution. And we do not even know if Einstein's version of God is correct. The correct version may be no version.it does not mean that humans are a product of evolution or Einstein's variation of God.
Nothing I read now about evolution means it happened without a designer. And here I did very well on my exams in reciting what I was told. Meanwhile getting back to the unique qualities of bees, snakes, and ants, they are unique and fabulous in their respective roles.Well, it does show even more how the difference isn't as great as some would like. Other evidence shows that the evolution happened.
Not as great as some would like? Really?? (what an answer -- I can do better than that...)Well, it does show even more how the difference isn't as great as some would like. Other evidence shows that the evolution happened.
Perhaps you do not understand what you have read since there is no evidence for a designer in any scientific papers that I have ever seen.Nothing I read now about evolution means it happened without a designer. And here I did very well on my exams in reciting what I was told. Meanwhile getting back to the unique qualities of bees, snakes, and ants, they are unique and fabulous in their respective roles.
Why would think that?I figured Herr Einstein's views on religion (which I don't think he liked much)...
And why would you conclude that? However, you are right about this. My question relates that it would not necessarily have to be that way....and a type of God who doesn't much care or is there but not there kind of.
That's not correct. Two books I have on that are "God In the Equation" by Corey Powell and "Einstein and Religion" by Max Jammer, the latter which is the better of the two imo. However, my favorite has long been "E=MC2: A Biography of the World's Most Famous Equation" by David Bodanis, but that spends only a little time on Einstein's view of religion, which is why I didn't list that one first.I'll bet he would agree with my assessment of his idea.
Perhaps you could present some evidence of God(s) manipulating genetics.lol -- that's why God did it as He willed.
No bottlenecks necessary anyway.
God can manipulate genetics as He wills, since He created genetics. Thinking about it -- the clay doesn't say to the potter, why did you make me this way.
You think the intellectual capacity of the other apes is "not too great." What makes you think that?I agree that it's a matter of sometimes very small degrees that makes humans different from, um, gorillas and chimpanzees. But -- I also still notice that things like writing and historical records have progressed rather rapidly from, um, humans -- not too much from chimpanzees, crocodiles, turtles, etc. So, summing it up, these little differences in genetics make a rather large difference in fulfilment of intellect and capabilities unique to the human figure. So, it astounds me that ants, the little beings they are, have astonishing capabilities, different from humans. I also doubt that their intellectual capacities are not too great. Maybe they just don't want to write books, write down songs, things like that. You think?
Why won't you address my point?The DNA -- any idea where or how it came about?
There is no evidence for a designer either.Nothing I read now about evolution means it happened without a designer. And here I did very well on my exams in reciting what I was told. Meanwhile getting back to the unique qualities of bees, snakes, and ants, they are unique and fabulous in their respective roles.
Then do it.Not as great as some would like? Really?? (what an answer -- I can do better than that...)
It's similar to the evidence unproduced of nature manipulating genes to produce a different species. But God's word is more powerful than man's words.Perhaps you could present some evidence of God(s) manipulating genetics.
No, it isn't. That would make it indistinguishable from nature.It's similar to the evidence unproduced of nature manipulating genes to produce a different species. But God's word is more powerful than man's words.
You mean your point that DNA just came about after a long period of non-intelligent forced programming?Why won't you address my point?
It's kinda like what Newton said: the thumb itself proves it didn't just "come about." (Yes, I paraphrase, can't remember his exact words but they make sense to me!) So now that I am older, I do not believe in evolution as the reason for life of earth. And yes, I include abiogenesis along with that. The more I think about it, the more cogent the Bible becomes. The more sense it makes.No, it isn't. That would make it indistinguishable from nature.
But you claim that God's doing it.
So I asked for evidence backing up your claim.
We know DNA exists. We know that it is naturally-occurring and how it operates. You are going a step (well, a lot of steps) further and claiming that not only did some God that you haven't demonstrated actually created DNA, but that this god also manipulates it. That would mean the God you speak of leaves some sort of mark on reality as we know it. So I'm asking you, how do we determine that this manipulation you speak of, is the results of some behavior on any God's part?
That is merely an argument from ignorance, and yes, Newton was ignorant about quite a few topics. Now we know that not to be true.It's kinda like what Newton said: the thumb itself proves it didn't just "come about." (Yes, I paraphrase, can't remember his exact words but they make sense to me!) So now that I am older, I do not believe in evolution as the reason for life of earth. And yes, I include abiogenesis along with that. The more I think about it, the more cogent the Bible becomes. The more sense it makes.
And what about those incredibly dangerous and viscous rabbits? No designer would have thought up such a creature as that and set it loose on the Earth. Clearly the product of evolution and survival of the fittest.There is no evidence for a designer either.
What about bees, snakes and ants?
That is merely an argument from ignorance, and yes, Newton was ignorant about quite a few topics. Now we know that not to be true.
Why won't you address my point?
You think the intellectual capacity of the other apes is "not too great." What makes you think that?
Primate Cognition | Learn Science at Scitable
Primate cognition - Wikipedia
Cognitive Science: Persistent Apes Are Intelligent Apes
Like in Humans, Genes Drive Half of Chimp Intelligence, Study Finds