the notion that evolution says we come from current primates should not be dismissed as a person knowing less than another in the feild as is shown in the fruit fly experiment, the original as well as the two diversified species continued to exist at the end of the test which only proves that our 'ancestors' didn't have to fall off the face of the earth.i find it ironic that evolution is still disbelieved by the same brainwashed religious types that have been taught (brainwashed) in schools, museums, TV science programs and in National Geographic all their lives.
This is exactly what I'm talking about! The creationist theory is not a theory in and of itself, it's merely an antagonist to the evolutionary theory. The entire quote above is concerning evolution, but why? We aren't talking about evolution! We're talking about creationism here!
you're asking me to find you a scientist who does not believe in a god(or use a 'god' in their theory for our existance) and not believe in evolution, this is actually like me asking you to find a scientist who believes in god in the same way i do whom accepts evolution(i.e.,ridiculous).
Not quite. You see, it is perfectly possible to believe in a god and evolution at the same time. I could list many people who practice this train of thought. If believing in god is a prerequisite for understanding and accepting the creationist theory, then you've just proven my point--creationism is a purely religious idea that is founded on absolutely no science whatsoever.
None of the sites you posted fit the criteria--they are either specifically trying to denounce evolution, or they involve god. If there are so many scientists who believe in creationism, why doesn't one of them write a paper outlining their findings?
If you want another site containing scientific information about evolution, abiogenesis, and other things,
www.talkorigins.org is a good one. I am curious, what are your personal problems with evolution? What about it doesn't make sense to you?
I am more than willing to agree that the theory of abiogenesis is not perfect, and that some of the more obscure aspects of evolution are still being worked out, but just because the evolutionary theory isn't perfect, doesn't mean that creationism is automatically true. You see, evolution is judged on a secular scale--it's flaws are found when it is compared to other scientific findings. Creationism, on the other hand, is based on the bible. That means that evolution and creationism are not judged on equal footing. If creationism were put up to the secular scale that evolution is put up to, it would be laughed out of the scientific community forever...and it has been.
Again, people--if your post contains the words 'god' or 'evolution' at all, then it is not acceptable. A true scientific theory should be able to be presented independently, let alone it's evidence be correct.