• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evidence showing evolution from one species to another

idea

Question Everything
Energy does not exist by itself. .

Matter does not exist by itself. It is impossible to reach 0 Kelvin etc.. Because matter is not independent of energy, does this mean that matter too, is not a substance?

Light... is it a particle? is it a wave?
Break matter apart, break it apart again, and again - matter is not such a solid substance after all.

All we can ever measure are interactions between entities - we never see the actual entity itself.

Intelligence is as much of a substance as anything else is.
 
Last edited:

idea

Question Everything
What evidence do you have the he did so for "future less biased generations", that tombstone dates from 2 decades after his death.

The "status quo" was not "energetics", there were 2 schools of thought at the time and both had supporters, Maxwell and Gibbs certainly supported Boltzmann. You are misrepresenting history.

Here is the tombstone, along with the story.
http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/boltzmanns-grave

another site:
http://www.famousscientists.org/ludwig-boltzmann/

another site:
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Boltzmann.html

It was a combination of depression - and "Attacks on his work continued and he began to feel that his life's work was about to collapse despite his defense of his theories."


There are agendas that taint all scientific research... NSF is a gov entity, and funds grants that support political platforms. Most universities are funded in large amount by taxpayers, and are likewise motivated to support political platforms in their work. Research that comes from the private sector promotes the well fare of the pharmaceutical company, or the energy company, or whatever industry it happens to be hired by. It's never pure "science", it's political games wrapped up in egotism and popularity contests. To think differently is to be naive... people want someone to trust in? Scientists are no more trustworthy than any other occupation.
 
Last edited:

Looncall

Well-Known Member
This is nonsense (replying to post 401.). I advise you to learn some science and abandon primitive essentialism.
 
Top