Evidences Supporting the Biblical Flood

[IndigoChild5559]

Actually she said 50 to 80 million years old. And the Rockies are rather young mountains. Much younger than either the Urals or Appalachians.

Yes, and the Appalachians are considerably more eroded.

I love geology. Always fascinating stuff.

 

[Audie]

What did Jesus teach that is wrong
What is wrong with Jesus' Sermon on the Mount

You have difficulty being on topic.

 

[Drunk_Uncle_Bob]

Tell me, how do...


...create freezing temperatures instantly?

Rapidly for sure. One of the fastest ways for a warm temperature to freeze rapidly over a large area. I'm sure there is still some debate over exactly how it would have went down but do you have any evidence supporting your theory about the flood? How would flood waters create freezing temperatures?

 

[Audie]

Rapidly for sure. One of the fastest ways for a warm temperature to freeze rapidly over a large area. I'm sure there is still some debate over exactly how it would have went down but do you have any evidence supporting your theory about the flood? How would flood waters create freezing temperatures?

Rapidly for sure, despite a complete lack of data
to say that such a thing actually happened. -?-
For sure tho no resesrcher ever published a paper
suppirting such an idea?

Now, woo woo sites, nut cases like Velikovski, there is
where to find flying saucers and flash frozen mammoths.

Problems?
Data such as the very wide range of ages (tens of thousands
of years) for the frozen carcasses. The putrid condition
of the carcasses.

Then too, a little old fashion working class common sense?

 

[nPeace]

All of the geological evidence we have does not support the biblical flood. The evidence you provided shows the processes including plate tectonics and the slow process of erosion. Not a bland statement without reason; a statement that all of the geological information argues against the flood including the information you provided. How much clearer to you want it stated?

You used another bland statement. Was that an explanation?
Since I gave you an argument containing geological information in support of the flood, the best you can do is state specifically what all refers to.

 

[URAVIP2ME]

Rapidly for sure. One of the fastest ways for a warm temperature to freeze rapidly over a large area. I'm sure there is still some debate over exactly how it would have went down but do you have any evidence supporting your theory about the flood? How would flood waters create freezing temperatures?

In short, the above-water canopy provided the Flood waters, so the collapse of the canopy allowed for freezing.

 

[URAVIP2ME]

He did not go to the Jews to become Christians. Jesus went to the Jews to better follow the Jewish faith. Jesus never said become Christian.

Jesus was exposing those corrupted religious leaders by pronouncing many ' woes ' upon them in the 23rd chapter of Matthew.

Those corrupted leaders were Not following the Jewish faith, but teaching their own traditions - Matthew 15:9
The New Covenant was started at Luke 22: 28-30 and went into effect at Pentecost.
So, yes the Jews were first informed and given the first opportunity to become Christian.

 

[Shad]

It shows you can't disprove what I said...
So taking all this into consideration you cannot argue against the possibility of mountains forming rapidly during and after the flood period. Nor can you deny the evidence that mountains during the pre-flood period may well have been significantly low.

If and could be are not arguments. Show your math for such a possibility.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You used another bland statement. Was that an explanation?
Since I gave you an argument containing geological information in support of the flood, the best you can do is state specifically what all refers to.

You used a very poor argument about mountains forming "quickly" where that was only a misinterpretation of events at best. An island may appear "sudden'y" in the ocean, but that does not mean that it has not been building up for centuries or more under water. Volcanic mountains are the only kind that can form anywhere near in a human lifetime. Most mountains are not volcanic and that makes your argument worthless.

 

[Bear Wild]

Jesus was exposing those corrupted religious leaders by pronouncing many ' woes ' upon them in the 23rd chapter of Matthew.

Those corrupted leaders were Not following the Jewish faith, but teaching their own traditions - Matthew 15:9
The New Covenant was started at Luke 22: 28-30 and went into effect at Pentecost.
So, yes the Jews were first informed and given the first opportunity to become Christian.

So Christianity is a sect of Jewish religion?

 

[Audie]

In short, the above-water canopy provided the Flood waters, so the collapse of the canopy allowed for freezing.

You cannot figure out that this is crazy talk?

 

[Hockeycowboy]

Oh my. First you tell a blatant falsehood, my statement was not baseless, and then you add to your dishonesty with a strawman argument.

And no, since the flood myth fails epicly it cannot explain anything. This is rather basic logic. Once again you should try to learn why scientists know that it did not happen.

Even if flood believers are too afraid to form a testable hypothesis that does not mean that the concept cannot be tested. For example if you want to claim that only two of each "kind" were on the Ark that alone refutes the story. The lesson of the cheetah tells us why.

You appear to be afraid to learn why we know that there was no flood. Fear of reality should not be part of your religion.

Why do you keep on saying I “should learn” why the Flood fails?
Grief! Post it!

I’ve posted evidences supporting it as a real event in the OP, but you haven’t dismantled / debunked any of it. I keep waiting for some solid counter argument from you, that’s not a strawman...
I’ve only seen one video.

I know of the population bottleneck of the cheetah, but i see no connection to how it proves the Flood didn’t happen.

This bottleneck was a more recent event.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

So Christianity is a sect of Jewish religion?

It’s an offshoot....Judaism and accurate Christianity worship the same God, Yahweh. That’s who Jesus worshipped (John 20:17).

Who were the First=Cent. Christians praying to, @ Acts of the Apostles 4:24-30? (Not Jesus).

Why do Christians use the Jewish Hebrew Scriptures (OT), if not?

 

[Hockeycowboy]

Some think assumptions are facts.

Yeah, rather like believing bacteria evolved into man.

 

[Audie]

Yeah, rather like believing bacteria evolved into man.

Creos, rather weirdly, are noted for believing that this
"belief" exists outside of their own skulls.

 

[Audie]

Why do you keep on saying I “should learn” why the Flood fails?
Grief! Post it!

I’ve posted evidences supporting it as a real event in the OP, but you haven’t dismantled / debunked any of it. I keep waiting for some solid counter argument from you, that’s not a strawman...
I’ve only seen one video.

I know of the population bottleneck of the cheetah, but i see no connection to how it proves the Flood didn’t happen.

This bottleneck was a more recent event.

You really -really dont get it that every species would
show similar genrtic limitations if they descended from
two individuals?

But never mind. God magiced them, right?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why do you keep on saying I “should learn” why the Flood fails?
Grief! Post it!

What aspect do you want to approach this from? I already mentioned the lack of a universal population bottleneck. Your version predicts that one should exist, instead of is the exception rather than the rule.

I’ve posted evidences supporting it as a real event in the OP, but you haven’t dismantled / debunked any of it. I keep waiting for some solid counter argument from you, that’s not a strawman...
I’ve only seen one video.

But you haven't. Perhaps we need to discuss the nature of evidence first. You have only posted ad hoc explanations. That is not evidence.

I know of the population bottleneck of the cheetah, but i see no connection to how it proves the Flood didn’t happen.

This bottleneck was a more recent event.

Nope, it occurred roughly at the same time as the extinction of the megafauna. The problem is that your story predicts an even more severe bottleneck for all unclean life and one that had for all clean life. The absence of that bottleneck alone refutes the flood.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

Creos, rather weirdly, are noted for believing that this
"belief" exists outside of their own skulls.

Excuse me..."eukaryotic amoebas" evolved into man, then.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Excuse me..."eukaryotic amoebas" evolved into man, then.

And you seem to have a problem with this concept.

You do realize that you started out as a one called organism, don't you?

 

[Audie]

Excuse me..."eukaryotic amoebas" evolved into man, then.

For a guy so sensitive about a "srawman",
you are funny, but, rong agin.

Do you think that there is something impossible
about a transition from single cell to multicellular
organism?