Atruthseeker
Active Member
Yeah! Just how a house builder would use wood for different things, not just the roof!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yeah! Just how a house builder would use wood for different things, not just the roof!
Yeah, but how did that get there?Or how, you know, multi-cellular organisms share a common ancestor.
So what you are saying is that Evolution is a closed book not open to critisism or questioning. Cos, it's funny, even Dawkins himself said no one know how life got started, and that includes you, so really, you can not claim a monopoly on how life started. Sorry.
In its early stages, ID creationism was indeed given its "seat at the table" and due consideration. For example, quite a few scientists read Behe's Darwin's Black Box, and responded with thorough, detailed critique and rebuttal. The problem was, Behe's responses to those rebuttals were anything but compelling (and at times, were laughably pathetic).Why thank you! Just proving my point. Cos this is the sort of response that those who want to bring ID or creationism to the table often get from those who belive in evolution. Not much fun when the shoe is on the other foot, when from the outset our argument is made fun of. If you don't believe that happens, just look at the previous posts in this thread.
Yeah, but how did that get there?
Is it? I believe that we can evolve, in that there can be changes within a species, but not that we can change into an entirely different and new species.Irrelevant.
And what mechanism would prevent this?Is it? I believe that we can evolve, in that there can be changes within a species, but not that we can change into an entirely different and new species.
And how would a species know when to stop changing, so as to avoid transforming into a seperate species?Is it? I believe that we can evolve, in that there can be changes within a species, but not that we can change into an entirely different and new species.
I DON'T KNOW! It just doesn't. Just as you can't mix a horse with a donkey. You get a mule but they can't reproduce! WHY!? WHY?!WAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!! How did the eyelid evolve? If it didn't evolve at the same time as the eye, wouldn't the eye dry out?And how would a species know when to stop changing, so as to avoid transforming into a seperate species?
Why? Because you say so? Are you suggesting we should take your word as unquestioned gospel?I DON'T KNOW! It just doesn't.
Are you saying we should take yours!? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAY TO CREATIONISTS!!!!!!!!!Why? Because you say so? Are you suggesting we should take your word as unquestioned gospel?
*yawn*
I wonder why creationists cannot get it through their thick skulls that evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis?
Chock up another thread lost to deliberate creationist ignorance.
Of course I don't. But let's get back to the question you were asked (How would a species know when to stop changing). Your answer was "I don't know. It just doesn't".Are you saying we should take yours!? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAY TO CREATIONISTS!!!!!!!!!
Of course I don't. But let's get back to the question you were asked (How would a species know when to stop changing). Your answer was "I don't know. It just doesn't".
So if you don't know how a population says "Whoa, we'd better stop evolving. A little more and we'll be a different species than our ancestors from 10,000 years ago, and we can't have that!", how exactly do you know that they do?
How does something know it needs something it has never had before? How does something say to itself: 'You know, I can't fly right now, but I tell you what, it wouldn't half come in handy if I did, so I will set off in a gradual path to what will enable me to fly. I know it'll be hit and miss along the way, and chances are I'll fail to get to where I'd like to get, but if this is something that will benefit me, then eventually, given enough time and the right conditions etc, I will get there!'
That is a just a stupid illustration, I know, but really, all the complexities in life would require such huge steps, it's virtually impossible to have happened by random mutation. Tell me, how did life evolve from non-life to life and we'll talk.
Why thank you! Just proving my point. Cos this is the sort of response that those who want to bring ID or creationism to the table often get from those who belive in evolution. Not much fun when the shoe is on the other foot, when from the outset our argument is made fun of. If you don't believe that happens, just look at the previous posts in this thread.
I get the impression he, like myself, suspects many opponents of evolution/ToE are mixing up these very different terms and making intelligent discussion of the subject difficult.
How does something know it needs something it has never had before? How does something say to itself: 'You know, I can't fly right now, but I tell you what, it wouldn't half come in handy if I did, so I will set off in a gradual path to what will enable me to fly. I know it'll be hit and miss along the way, and chances are I'll fail to get to where I'd like to get, but if this is something that will benefit me, then eventually, given enough time and the right conditions etc, I will get there!'
That is a just a stupid illustration, I know, but really, all the complexities in life would require such huge steps, it's virtually impossible to have happened by random mutation. Tell me, how did life evolve from non-life to life and we'll talk.
You don't have to take anyone word for it, all of the evidence is readily available should you choose to look at it. The fact that you choose to ignore it is not our problem.Are you saying we should take yours!? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAY TO CREATIONISTS!!!!!!!!!
Does water need to know the topography of an area to find it's way to the ocean?How does something know it needs something it has never had before? How does something say to itself: 'You know, I can't fly right now, but I tell you what, it wouldn't half come in handy if I did, so I will set off in a gradual path to what will enable me to fly. I know it'll be hit and miss along the way, and chances are I'll fail to get to where I'd like to get, but if this is something that will benefit me, then eventually, given enough time and the right conditions etc, I will get there!'
That is a just a stupid illustration, I know, but really, all the complexities in life would require such huge steps, it's virtually impossible to have happened by random mutation. Tell me, how did life evolve from non-life to life and we'll talk.