Pozessed
Todd
I'm going right to the big bang theory. The birth of evolution would have to start with the birth and evolution of the universe and therefore they go hand in hand. Most say evolution starts from microorganisms, but it actually starts with the big bang which gives way for the possibility for "earthly" evolution to happen in the first place.
We haven't studied the evolution of our cosmic energies and where these energies originated yet were so fast to deny a creator.... Not to mention the only reason people would start believing evolutionary theory to not be programmed by a creator is for self absorbed reasons.
The Big Bang did not occur at a single point in space as an "explosion." It is better thought of as the simultaneous appearance of space everywhere in the universe. That region of space that is within our present horizon was indeed no bigger than a point in the past. Nevertheless, if all of space both inside and outside our horizon is infinite now, it was born infinite. If it is closed and finite, then it was born with zero volume and grew from that. In neither case is there a "center of expansion" - a point from which the universe is expanding away from. In the ball analogy, the radius of the ball grows as the universe expands, but all points on the surface of the ball (the universe) recede from each other in an identical fashion. The interior of the ball should not be regarded as part of the universe in this analogy.
copied from Nasa
The Fibonacci sequence. It is found all over the universe right down to our DNA. Notice how it seems like a "signature mark" that any intelligent mind would use to signify their work.
With the intellect we have now, it is a shame that some of us feel the need to discredit creation only because we feel the need to be the superior intelligence.
Just because we can explain how physical life started, we have no true explanation of cosmic energy or spiritual science that is needed for life to exist.
In reality we are 99% air and energy and only 1% matter, science proves this. If you think of the creator as a conscious energy that grows when it gains knowledge our universes existence should not be hard to fathom.
We haven't studied the evolution of our cosmic energies and where these energies originated yet were so fast to deny a creator.... Not to mention the only reason people would start believing evolutionary theory to not be programmed by a creator is for self absorbed reasons.
The Big Bang did not occur at a single point in space as an "explosion." It is better thought of as the simultaneous appearance of space everywhere in the universe. That region of space that is within our present horizon was indeed no bigger than a point in the past. Nevertheless, if all of space both inside and outside our horizon is infinite now, it was born infinite. If it is closed and finite, then it was born with zero volume and grew from that. In neither case is there a "center of expansion" - a point from which the universe is expanding away from. In the ball analogy, the radius of the ball grows as the universe expands, but all points on the surface of the ball (the universe) recede from each other in an identical fashion. The interior of the ball should not be regarded as part of the universe in this analogy.
copied from Nasa
The Fibonacci sequence. It is found all over the universe right down to our DNA. Notice how it seems like a "signature mark" that any intelligent mind would use to signify their work.
With the intellect we have now, it is a shame that some of us feel the need to discredit creation only because we feel the need to be the superior intelligence.
Just because we can explain how physical life started, we have no true explanation of cosmic energy or spiritual science that is needed for life to exist.
In reality we are 99% air and energy and only 1% matter, science proves this. If you think of the creator as a conscious energy that grows when it gains knowledge our universes existence should not be hard to fathom.
Last edited: