Arp is heavily critisized and not followed by anyone in mainstream science.
Its just like you to find outdated work to base worthless findings on.
good lord his theories are 50 years OLD! [facepalm]
Halton Arp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Arp originally proposed his theories in the 1960s; however,
telescopes and astronomical instrumentation have advanced greatly since then:
Nonetheless, Arp has not wavered from his stand against the
Big Bang and still publishes articles
I have tried to rewrite the entry to be as nice to Arp as possible and even present his position in a good lightwhile stating that current scientific evidence overwhelmingly disfavors his position
I think it is wrong to give the impression Dr. Arp's theories about redshift ever had much acceptance within the scientific community
According to Arp's POV the space is flat.
Face it! all you do is try and find outdated material to go against modern known and accepted science to protect your theology.