-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution is False and Impossible
- Thread starter SilvaMo0n
- Start date
painted wolf
Grey Muzzle
1) birds are a wonderful example of how natural selection works... and sexual selection.
Wings are not just for flight. Anyone who actually studied birds would realize this.
2) Elephants and giraffes have transitional fossil species. Anyone who actually studied paleontology would realize this.
3) sorry to break the news... but scientist have created organic molecules from scratch... they have created living viruses from raw materials. And no scientist says that complex cells just poofed into existence as they are today... that would just be silly.
The first cells would have been much simpler than they are today.. more like what we can create in the labs.
Anyone who actually studied biology would realize this.
4) This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard....
5) Ok... this one is pretty close to #4 in dumb. Are we talking about prokaryote or eukaryote DNA checking? They are a bit different (eukaryotes are more complex)
Also Prokaryotes can choose to shut off their DNA checking machinery in order to speed up transcription processes.. this is part of why they mutate and evolve so rapidly.
Regardless, no system is perfect and mistakes happen with every new generation of cells... this is how cancer happens.
This is why DNA checking evolved.
Anyone who studied microbiology would know this.
6) someone obviously never really studied physics...
7) someone never studied genetics... chromosomal fusion is well studied. As is chromosomal duplication.
just for the lolz...
8) Evolution only deals with how life changes over time. You have a problem with "big bang" bring it up with the physicists... that's not our department.
Obviously someone never studied physics.
9) wait what? Ok this one may tie with #4.
First, there is no proof that there isn't life on Mars...We haven't actually looked for life in and around the water deposits yet... and secondly... so what?
If Mars didn't have the right conditions for life, that doesn't mean that Earth couldn't have... that's like arguing that because there are no lakes on Mars that lakes can exist on Earth.
Someone hasn't studied astrobiology.
10) Again... what?
Why should we expect other lifeforms... intelligent or not.. to use radio? I've always wondered about that... why would we expect alien life to be anything like us?
It's not like we've been listening that long, or that closely... SETI isn't exactly a major industry. Because I have never watched a bollywood film, that must mean that they don't make movies in India...
There is nothing 'scientific' in any of these 'scientific facts'... it's utter hogwash and obvious that the poster has never actually studied any of the scientific disiplines that they claim support their position.
wa:do
Wings are not just for flight. Anyone who actually studied birds would realize this.
2) Elephants and giraffes have transitional fossil species. Anyone who actually studied paleontology would realize this.
3) sorry to break the news... but scientist have created organic molecules from scratch... they have created living viruses from raw materials. And no scientist says that complex cells just poofed into existence as they are today... that would just be silly.
The first cells would have been much simpler than they are today.. more like what we can create in the labs.
Anyone who actually studied biology would realize this.
4) This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard....
5) Ok... this one is pretty close to #4 in dumb. Are we talking about prokaryote or eukaryote DNA checking? They are a bit different (eukaryotes are more complex)
Also Prokaryotes can choose to shut off their DNA checking machinery in order to speed up transcription processes.. this is part of why they mutate and evolve so rapidly.
Regardless, no system is perfect and mistakes happen with every new generation of cells... this is how cancer happens.
This is why DNA checking evolved.
Anyone who studied microbiology would know this.
6) someone obviously never really studied physics...
7) someone never studied genetics... chromosomal fusion is well studied. As is chromosomal duplication.
just for the lolz...
no, but they do prove that a college education does impart knowledge about a subject. It's hard to understand a subject without any genuine knowledge about it.
8) Evolution only deals with how life changes over time. You have a problem with "big bang" bring it up with the physicists... that's not our department.
Obviously someone never studied physics.
9) wait what? Ok this one may tie with #4.
First, there is no proof that there isn't life on Mars...We haven't actually looked for life in and around the water deposits yet... and secondly... so what?
If Mars didn't have the right conditions for life, that doesn't mean that Earth couldn't have... that's like arguing that because there are no lakes on Mars that lakes can exist on Earth.
Someone hasn't studied astrobiology.
10) Again... what?
Why should we expect other lifeforms... intelligent or not.. to use radio? I've always wondered about that... why would we expect alien life to be anything like us?
It's not like we've been listening that long, or that closely... SETI isn't exactly a major industry. Because I have never watched a bollywood film, that must mean that they don't make movies in India...
There is nothing 'scientific' in any of these 'scientific facts'... it's utter hogwash and obvious that the poster has never actually studied any of the scientific disiplines that they claim support their position.
wa:do
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
I was browsing when I found this.
Sweet, more creationist swill that flies in the face of evidence and logic. Thanks for sharing.
Jeremy Mason
Well-Known Member
3.14
Well-Known Member
Luminous
non-existential luminary
This just shows that the writer is a fallable being like the rest of us. most of the information is false or mistaken. so i'll begin:I was browsing when I found this.
1. i doubt that bird wings evolved from 'stubs'. wings could have evolved to glide, or jump, or just increase surface area, etc. and i think they evolved from frontal walkin apendages, not the other way around like the writer claims that 'evolutionists' believe.
2. This is like saying that if you cant find any old designs of lests say...pencils. that that is because pencils magically burst into existance just the way they are today. true that the grouping does not prove evolution, so why is the writer conserned with elephants and giraffs. will his indominable will to believe in creationism be surpresses if he/she ever see's the fosssil 'links'? i doubt this. however the grouping makes sense because of the age of the fossils.
3. This is like saying that if i cant make chicken soup then chicken soup cant be made at all. it really makes no sense. Single cell complexity does not 'prove' evolution wrong because multi-cell complexity doesn't either.
4. first of all: males have the Xy pair and females have the XX pair, not the other way around. the female whomb is in no way a fortress where no influence can be instilled. there are many particles that go through our bodies and many molecules that travel through the female body.
5. DNA error checking is not infalable.
6. Infact, the second law of thermodynamics states that the only thing organization can come from is Chaos. Because of the unorganization of the sun the earth can organize it self. its a dumb way to explain but i am in no way a physicist.
7. chromosome count is not the only reason that species cant interbreed. im sure some plant out there has 46 chromosoms. also chromosomes duplicate all the time as in down syndrom.
8. evolutionist dont need to deal with other questions. evolutionists can believe in the big bang, or god's creation, or anything else that has nothing to do with evolution.
9. Only because the writer says so.
10. if i go out into the forest, and i hear no human sounds, does that prove that people dont exist?
the writer didn't convince me the least bit. how can you convince someone to stop believing in something without offering an alternative, anyway?
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Hmmmm
It would seem to me there is more scientific proof of evolution (even if it is wrong) then there is about the existence of god.
Even the fact that monkey and humans are similar is more scientific evidence for evolution than there is of god.
-Q
It would seem to me there is more scientific proof of evolution (even if it is wrong) then there is about the existence of god.
Even the fact that monkey and humans are similar is more scientific evidence for evolution than there is of god.
-Q
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
what about potatos and humans? you do know that we both have 46 cromosomes, so that makes us potatos just because we have some similarities. who would have thought?
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Good job on completely bypassing the point of the whole post and responding with a completely retarded statement.
You're an inspiration
-Q
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
is that the best you can do?
just because humans and apes have similarities that in no way proves evolution and the theory that humans are the descendants of apes, because we have similarities with potatos, so are are descendants of vegetables then. how can we know what we are if we follow your theory? it's flawless.
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
First thing I thought when I read this was "half human potato hybrid".
that would kind of explain the human colour, just like there are different coloured potatos, there are humans, but then again potatos don't have any hair, so a human-potato-chimp hubrid could be kind of close
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Just because you think there is a god in no way proves that there is one.
And no one claims that potatos and humans come from common ancestors.
-Q
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
i don't think that god exists, i know he exists thats why i believe in him.
i'm claiming that humans and potatos came from the same ancestors because they have similarities with each other just like apes and humans do.
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
whats this, i don't understand it.
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Gharib
I want Khilafah back
no i meant can you rephrase your statement, i don't understand what you are saying.
DarkSun
:eltiT
Same ploidy, but different genes.