Evolution is False and Impossible

[gnostic]

If Adam was created about 5800 years ago, then how do you explain human settlement in Jericho as far back 11,000 years ago (9,000 BCE)?

By 8000 to 7000 years ago, there are walls and even a shrine.

If there were no humans before Adam, then how can there be human settlement in Jericho before the supposed Adam's creation?

 

[Gharib]

If Adam was created about 5800 years ago, then how do you explain human settlement in Jericho as far back 11,000 years ago (9,000 BCE)?

By 8000 to 7000 years ago, there are walls and even a shrine.

If there were no humans before Adam, then how can there be human settlement in Jericho before the supposed Adam's creation?

who said that adam was created 5800 years ago? i certainly didn't.

 

[painted wolf]

Actually Potatoes have 48 chromosomes not 46.
And yes we have similarities... we are related... but very very distantly and those similarities are very very few.
We are both eukaryotic for example.

We share a common ancestor that was a simple eukaryote.

wa:do

 

[averageJOE]

Sure! Sure! Evolution is impossible! Because is just makes so much more sense that the human race came from a pile of dirt!

 

[Gharib]

Sure! Sure! Evolution is impossible! Because is just makes so much more sense that the human race came from a pile of dirt!

care to prove your statement wrong?

 

[Gharib]

Actually Potatoes have 48 chromosomes not 46.
And yes we have similarities... we are related... but very very distantly and those similarities are very very few.
We are both eukaryotic for example.

We share a common ancestor that was a simple eukaryote.

wa:do

thanks for the insight, i will resist saying some things due to not wanting to talk about humans being related to potatoes or chimps.

 

[painted wolf]

Mitakuye Oyasin.... we are all related.

wa:do

 

[Gharib]

Mitakuye Oyasin.... we are all related.

wa:do

exactly my point, well for another thread anyway. and just because we are related to chimps that does not make us apes or descendants of one. right?

 

[painted wolf]

exactly my point, well for another thread anyway. and just because we are related to chimps that does not make us apes or descendants of one. right?

it kind of does actually...
We are apes... by the way biology defines ape, we are most absolutely apes.
But there is nothing wrong with that... everyone is descended from someone, and as a whole apes are not a bad bunch of species.
We are not descendants of chimps... they are our closest brother... we share a common ancestor or parent species.

wa:do

 

[Gharib]

it kind of does actually...
We are apes... by the way biology defines ape, we are most absolutely apes.
But there is nothing wrong with that... everyone is descended from someone, and as a whole apes are not a bad bunch of species.
We are not descendants of chimps... they are our closest brother... we share a common ancestor or parent species.

wa:do

i was affraid you would say that.

but anyway. whats this thread about?

i think tht person in the link had some very good points especially the bird thing about how they could not have became reptiles or vise versa however it is, due to their lungs.

 

[painted wolf]

but anyway. whats this thread about?

Some very very poorly thought out "arguments" against evolution.

i think tht person in the link had some very good points especially the bird thing about how they could not have became reptiles or vise versa however it is, due to their lungs.

It may look good on the surface, but once you have studied dinosaurs (and even other archosaurs) it no longer makes any sense.
For example, all Saurischian dinosaurs had air sacs like bird do, that weave through their hollowed bones.
Plus the lungs argument needs to explain why dinosaurs have so many other bird features... feathers, wings, beaks, even bird behaviors and so on.

wa:do

 

[Gharib]

Some very very poorly thought out "arguments" against evolution.

It may look good on the surface, but once you have studied dinosaurs (and even other archosaurs) it no longer makes any sense.
For example, all Saurischian dinosaurs had air sacs like bird do, that weave through their hollowed bones.
Plus the lungs argument needs to explain why dinosaurs have so many other bird features... feathers, wings, beaks, even bird behaviors and so on.

wa:do

first try to remember that just because we have similarities with potatoes, it does not make us one ok.

second, do you know the difference in the lungs of birds and reptiles?

 

[painted wolf]

first try to remember that just because we have similarities with potatoes, it does not make us one ok.

We are both eukaryotes... just because we are not potatoes doesn't mean we have no connection to them at all.

second, do you know the difference in the lungs of birds and reptiles?

Yes I do...
Do you know about the anatomy of advanced theropod dinosaurs? (who are not reptiles by the way.)

wa:do

 

[Gharib]

We are both eukaryotes... just because we are not potatoes doesn't mean we have no connection to them at all.

you really are loosing me with these kind of statements.

Yes I do...
Do you know about the anatomy of advanced theropod dinosaurs? (who are not reptiles by the way.)

wa:do

no i have never heard of them until now, what's their story?

 

[Autodidact]

what about potatos and humans? you do know that we both have 46 cromosomes, so that makes us potatos just because we have some similarities. who would have thought?

Do you know what a Poe is? It is a living embodiment of Poe's law:

Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.

That is, your remark is so utterly stupid that is is impossible to tell it from a parody of a creationist.

 

[Autodidact]

is that the best you can do?

just because humans and apes have similarities that in no way proves evolution and the theory that humans are the descendants of apes, because we have similarities with potatos, so are are descendants of vegetables then. how can we know what we are if we follow your theory? it's flawless.

If the Theory of Evolution (ToE) rested on the similiarities between humans and other apes (humans are in fact apes) it would not have been accepted by Biology as a foundational theory. Let me guess: You have no idea what ToE actually says or what the evidence is in its support, do you?

 

[Gharib]

Do you know what a Poe is? It is a living embodiment of Poe's law:

Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.

That is, your remark is so utterly stupid that is is impossible to tell it from a parody of a creationist.

why is it stupid? is it not true?

 

[Gharib]

If the Theory of Evolution (ToE) rested on the similiarities between humans and other apes (humans are in fact apes) it would not have been accepted by Biology as a foundational theory. Let me guess: You have no idea what ToE actually says or what the evidence is in its support, do you?

is that why it is still called a theory? because there is no strong evidence to support it?

you guessed wrong i think.

 

[Autodidact]

I hate to dignify it with a response, but, esalem, have you ever noticed that people are more like apes than we are like potatoes? Just askin'.

 

[Autodidact]

Just because you think there is a god in no way proves that there is one.

And no one claims that potatos and humans come from common ancestors.

-Q

Actually, modern biology asserts that they do, along with every other organism on earth.