Evolution, maybe someone can explain?

[leroy]

I have given them multiple times now.
I'm done playing your silly games.

You where asked to provide a criteria or test that all fishes pass and all non fishes fail.


Even by your own admission you failed to provide that test.

Learned more; gained an understanding of the mechanisms involved.

There was a time we didn't understand day vs night, the seasons, volcanoes, earthquakes, tsunamis. We attributed them to divine magic.
Now we've "worked out the details," and God has retreated as a factor. Religious apologists have abandoned these "proofs" and moved on to the current vanguards of science.

Yes theist where wrong with volcanos in the past..... Therefore they must also be wrong with the FT argument and other modern arguments.

Can any expert in logical fallacies tell me what is the name of that fallacy?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Given that you keep circumventing my y point I must be making a very good argument

Given that you keep talking about mere hypotheticals as if they aren't hypotheticals, I'm guessing the opposite is true.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You where asked to provide a criteria or test that all fishes pass and all non fishes fail.
Even by your own admission you failed to provide that test.

I 'admitted' to no such thing and provided you with ample definitions and links.
You are arguing in extremely bad faith again. Everybody here knows it. Except a handful of posters who like you suffer from selective amnesia.

Yes theist where wrong with volcanos in the past..... Therefore they must also be wrong with the FT argument and other modern arguments.
Can any expert in logical fallacies tell me what is the name of that fallacy?

"FT and other modern arguments" are themselves cesspools of logical fallacies.