The point in my topic: there was needed time also for the evolution of the planet in many aspects so if there was any evolution of animals, you have to sum up all those periods in total to be objective about the appearance of all kind of living things: all kinds of microorganisms, plants, animals, ... and alleged hominids.
After that you need to analize the time needed for those hominids to become what we are today or more exactly what we've being for about 6 millennia, with cultures, languages, knowledge of all kind of aspects of nature, arts, etc. ... Curiously there is not known evolution of human knowledge before the first known civilization: it was just there and nobody tells how it appears without especulate about everything, but without any real proof of that other "evolution": the human intelligence.
That first civilization had mathematics, astronomy, engineering, early childhood education, knowledge of agriculture, metallurgy, etc. Where all that came from?
Sum up the times. Again: something is not adding up.
Anyways, keep talking; I am reading you.
Have a good one.
After that you need to analize the time needed for those hominids to become what we are today or more exactly what we've being for about 6 millennia, with cultures, languages, knowledge of all kind of aspects of nature, arts, etc. ... Curiously there is not known evolution of human knowledge before the first known civilization: it was just there and nobody tells how it appears without especulate about everything, but without any real proof of that other "evolution": the human intelligence.
That first civilization had mathematics, astronomy, engineering, early childhood education, knowledge of agriculture, metallurgy, etc. Where all that came from?
Sum up the times. Again: something is not adding up.
Anyways, keep talking; I am reading you.
Have a good one.
Last edited:
