We replaced the cheerleaders that the atheists have on the forum...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution of what?
- Thread starter Eli G
- Start date
I speak for science...which you can certainly reject. Free will after all.Speak for yourself.
Again, no answer.We replaced the cheerleaders that the atheists have on the forum...
I'll just consider the practice a response where there is no relative, contextual substance and emojis are substituted to appeal to the emotions of the person making the response. That seems to fit the evidence.
I am unware that willful ignorance requires cheering on?
GardenLady
Active Member
I have wondered the same about training in extensive proof-texting. Much of which seems to jump from book to book and chapter to chapter in a way that appears to me to be designed to prevent the listener from effectively contemplating the presentation lest he/she lose track in all the page-turning.
Psss, so much arrogance!
Tell that to transsexuals and age regressors
What if someone wants to be a banana?
Maybe it is just me, but I always get the sense of obfuscation. Sometimes in the manner of the Gish gallop. But that is often what is seen as a technique employed with literalist/creationist positions in general.
So much nothing as I see it. I don't think I'm alone in that.Psss, so much arrogance!
Tell that to transsexuals and age regressors
What if someone wants to be a banana?
Do you have anything to say in support of your view or just these random, meaningless responses out of context?
There's that indirect response thing with even more emojis.I already said goodbye to you... Don't you have anyone to talk to?
I'll let you know when I'm done with you.
I'm having a great day.
What have we learned here?
1. The environment doesn't change to meet the needs of living things. Populations of living things respond to the environment.
2. This response in the form of heritable changes that effect fitness drives the evolution of those populations.
3. Apples do not evolve into bananas and no one outside of creationists makes that claim.
4. Most scientists accept the theory of evolution.
5. People that accept the theory of evolution are not called evolutionists except by those denying the theory for baseless personal and emotional reasons.
6. The theory of evolution, like all scientific theories, is based on evidence and offers the best explanation of that evidence that is available.
1. The environment doesn't change to meet the needs of living things. Populations of living things respond to the environment.
2. This response in the form of heritable changes that effect fitness drives the evolution of those populations.
3. Apples do not evolve into bananas and no one outside of creationists makes that claim.
4. Most scientists accept the theory of evolution.
5. People that accept the theory of evolution are not called evolutionists except by those denying the theory for baseless personal and emotional reasons.
6. The theory of evolution, like all scientific theories, is based on evidence and offers the best explanation of that evidence that is available.
It sounds like you have an obsession...Someone told me somewhere here that some of the atheists here are so agressive with believers because they carry with them a trauma since when they were religious... I was born and raise as a JW in a communist country and I do not carry any trauma with me, so
In a scenario where God will save loyal worshippers, believers are survivors,
And since believers are not so easily traumatized, nor so unhealthyly obsessed with what others decide to believe... in the scenario where stronger people will survive, the future belongs to believers also.
At the end being a believer is smarter. Sorry for you guys.
Have a nice weekend ... I got my weekend meeting soon. We do have a lot of brothers and sisters to talk to.
Someone told me somewhere here that some of the atheists here are so agressive with believers because they carry with them a trauma since when they were religious... I was born and raise as a JW in a communist country and I do not carry any trauma with me, so
In a scenario where God will save loyal worshippers, believers are survivors,
And since believers are not so easily traumatized, nor so unhealthyly obsessed with what others decide to believe... in the scenario where stronger people will survive, the future belongs to believers also.
At the end being a believer is smarter. Sorry for you guys.
Have a nice weekend ... I got my weekend meeting soon. We do have a lot of brothers and sisters to talk to.
Dan is Christian.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Then how do you explain the endless scientific evidence that says that we did descend from apes and none to the contrary. There is no scientific evidence for creationism.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes
They are great!! Changing font size, and using bold letters helps too!!! Oh? Did I forget excessive use of punctuation marks?!?!!?$$$ Color is very convincing too!
I don't really care. This has nothing to do with supporting what you claim. It's all just words to no meaningful end. Self-aggrandizement to no valuable purpose as I see it.
Someone told me somewhere here that some of the atheists here are so agressive with believers because they carry with them a trauma since when they were religious... I was born and raise as a JW in a communist country and I do not carry any trauma with me, so
In a scenario where God will save loyal worshippers, believers are survivors,
And since believers are not so easily traumatized, nor so unhealthyly obsessed with what others decide to believe... in the scenario where stronger people will survive, the future belongs to believers also.
At the end being a believer is smarter. Sorry for you guys.
Have a nice weekend ... I got my weekend meeting soon. We do have a lot of brothers and sisters to talk to.
I wonder how much of a winner a person is to have to resort to things like this?
gnostic
The Lost One
as far as I know, Dan isn’t an atheist.
calling a person atheist, just because he disagree with your personal views or beliefs, only demonstrates that you are anti-science, and you make empty accusation of person being atheist.
people can be atheists, theists or any other -isms, and still accept Evolution as biological and scientific facts, but accusing theist of being atheist is just rude.
There are plenty of Christians and jews, here at RF, have accepted Evolution as science.
but more importantly, Evolution isn’t a religion. Also Evolution isn’t atheism.
McBell
Unbound
Wow.
Someone told me somewhere here that some of the atheists here are so agressive with believers because they carry with them a trauma since when they were religious... I was born and raise as a JW in a communist country and I do not carry any trauma with me, so
In a scenario where God will save loyal worshippers, believers are survivors,
And since believers are not so easily traumatized, nor so unhealthyly obsessed with what others decide to believe... in the scenario where stronger people will survive, the future belongs to believers also.
At the end being a believer is smarter. Sorry for you guys.
Have a nice weekend ... I got my weekend meeting soon. We do have a lot of brothers and sisters to talk to.
It is amazing how much you can still say with your foot so firmly in your mouth...
McBell
Unbound
I have no clue what your point is. But weekend reading on animals who routinely change their sex.Psss, so much arrogance!
Tell that to transsexuals and age regressors
What if someone wants to be a banana?
https://www.science.org/content/article/knowing-when-change-sex
As a practicing scientist and university faculty teaching graduate and undergraduate students as well as making representation about the status of various technologies to govt bodies, I routinely speak for the scientific consensus. So it's my job to speak for science. Nothing arrogant about it
Heyo
Veteran Member
I also don't carry any trauma since I never believed.
Someone told me somewhere here that some of the atheists here are so agressive with believers because they carry with them a trauma since when they were religious... I was born and raise as a JW in a communist country and I do not carry any trauma with me, so
But to explain the "obsession" of some science minded people here: we frequently have "hit and run" creationists. Some of us see it as their duty to show to any ingenuous reader how and why the creationists are wrong lest their tactic works on younger and less educated members.
We have different opinions of when that is accomplished. I think that you are no longer a danger as you have thoroughly embarrassed yourself. Others are more meticulous.
But then again, I'm not a working scientist nor am I any kind of teacher, just an interested lay person. Scientists and teachers have an assignment to keep the population informed.