• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evolve Now

Danny Heim

Active Member
Below is a blog I've written called Evolve Now. It's long, 7000 words. But you may find it interesting. It's radical, very radical, but so are our times. It discusses climate change as a global emergency. It is geared towards liberals, asking them to wake up. Below is one of the chapters if you just want a short read. Respond however you wish. I apologize to the respondants of the initial thread and that this is this threads second run, but I felt it needed the following insert and a better start. It's not easy to post a blog, and this one is still in it's editing stage, it's a first draft. But, I'm tired and am just having to push forward. I spent 18 years at war with this topic, with this paper I am done. So, here it is.

Evolve Now | Evolve Now


Chapter 4



The New World



Doesn’t that sound sweet - the New World? Yes it does, but I’m sorry; the coming new world is not going to be a Utopia. In fact, it is going to be a bit of hell. Oh sure, we’ll have to think different, and new thinking is exciting. That is, until you are forced into new thinking. What I’m talking about here is not some utopian brand of a New Age la la land. This is about no ideology whatsoever. It’s about saving our ***; nothing more. So if you are reading this paper for an easy answer, put it down. And if you read on anyway, then have your hammer and shovel ready when you are done. I’m sorry, I would like it to be utopia myself; I truly would. In fact, most of the years I’ve been an activist that was my thinking. And it still is, however, before utopia can arrive, we’ll have to be breathing. Let’s get that done first.
To get started, we’ll first have to do some stopping. The first thing that has to stop is the attention given to economic growth. I am saying we are in a condition beyond economics, and as of late, government policy as well. It's going to hurt, no way around it. To reshape the infrastructure of the world will make money meaningless and to a large extent government also; it's simply something that will have to get done. Humans will do this one, not the market, and not government policy.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not attacking democracy or the free market. But it just so happens that the free market principle only works if there is a steady 3% growth rate of the GDP. That’s great except a growth rate means production, and production means pollution. Well, if we were going to be the generation of humans that had an abrupt evolution and decided to save itself from extinction, then we are not going to do it with our eyes focused on Wall Street. We won’t lightly dance our way out of this one by adjusting the interest rate, or even by new programs for new energy for new jobs. There will be no ideology trying to rule the world, just billions of people searching for a place to grow food and find shelter. If you think this is not going to happen and happen quick better think again. Because it’s already happening now. We are already in danger of losing many habitats for food, both natural and controlled. From fisheries to farm ground, loss of biodiversity, destruction of coral reefs, acidification of the ocean. All these and more are happening now.
These sorts of changes to our natural world are going to cause us to react unnaturally. At least in terms of what we’ve gotten used to in our economic, political, cultural and social paradigms. Money will be useless in our pursuit of change. So we may as well plan on doing away with it. There will not be enough money to rebuild the world; we’ll just have to do it for free because we’ll die if we don’t. The same goes for our political systems as they are now, they can’t help us anymore. When you are running from a train hauling down on your ***, you don’t wait for an act of congress or a new stimulus package to jump off the tracks, you just jump. Jump in this case means coming forward and saying to humanity, “What can I do to help?”

And you’d better get used to the idea of having no real structure in your life. You’ll be working all day and sleeping and eating with your work mates. Remember the Pyramids? They all worked to make them, everyone one in town had to go and haul rock. We are there again, but his time it is not out of the choice of any human or human entity, the choice is coming from too much heat, it’s that simple. Turn your heating system up on an 80 degree day; turn it all the way up. Then wait and see how long you’ll sit there waiting for someone else to tell you to turn it down. You won’t, instead you will get up and do it your self; the heat will make you do it. And that is what is coming at you my friends, HEAT.

More stopping

Are you getting it? We have to stop right now! We have to stop doing what it is we do. And that is, produce. NO MORE PRODUCTION!! Except for that which will keep us in food, water and shelter and able to work at making our new world. The next 3 to 4 generations will be like none other in human history. They will be sacrifice generations. They will be the hands that got the job done. And if they are not that, then it is very possible that there will be no more generations to compare to and past generations will be forgotten because no one will be here to remember them.

Me and You

We have to stop with ideologies. They have been fun, but the fun is over. If you are a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, a Hindu, a Pagan, whatever; then you’ll have to leave it at the door. If you are a conservative, a liberal, a democrat or republican, an atheist, an agnostic, egalitarian, totalitarian, evolutionist, creationist, pro life or pro choice, gay or straight, no matter what your ideology is, you will have to leave it at the door and pick up your tools. You will work along side your enemies, or risk extinction.

These next few decades will be all about stopping. We can’t start the new unless we stop the old. Actually, we won’t be starting the new; we’ll just be arresting the old until the new that works is found. In the mean time, we’ll need housing, food, water and clothing. Preparing for that eventuality will take the first two or three decades of the next ten. Just getting ready to get ready will take years. Don’t worry if you are over 50 right now in 2010. Most likely you will not have to hammer and shovel, your kids will, but you grandmas and grandpas won’t. We will need your wisdom, your patience and your influence. Most of all, we will need you to be alarmists. We will need you to shout out the coming peril. The whole lot of you a bunch of John the Baptists, that’s what we need.

These first few decades will be the hardest to pull off. In fact, the initial acceptance of our demise is the first task to accomplish, and the most difficult. For that we will need everyone to study up and learn about climate change and its true realities. I know, we aren’t even close to that right now, but we have to try. Remember, we have only 100 years to get 80 years worth of work done. And that is if all goes well. There is absolutely no time to waste.
 
Last edited:

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
I read some of it, but I don't think you'll find that everyone will be working together if what you're saying is right. (I'm skeptical that it's as bad as you say it is, but that's beside the point)

What would happen if you're right and world-changing events are inevitably in motion and so on and so forth is that INDEED some people would be drinking the expensive champagne while others drank dirty water from a tin cup (or whatever you said shouldn't happen). That's EXACTLY what would happen though. When things get tough, the gap between the haves and the have-nots turns into a chasm -- it gets much much much much wider, NOT the other way around.
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
I read some of it, but I don't think you'll find that everyone will be working together if what you're saying is right. (I'm skeptical that it's as bad as you say it is, but that's beside the point)

What would happen if you're right and world-changing events are inevitably in motion and so on and so forth is that INDEED some people would be drinking the expensive champagne while others drank dirty water from a tin cup (or whatever you said shouldn't happen). That's EXACTLY what would happen though. When things get tough, the gap between the haves and the have-nots turns into a chasm -- it gets much much much much wider, NOT the other way around.

That one vital point makes all the difference, you say "(I'm skeptical that it's as bad as you say it is, but that's beside the point)". That is not beside the point, because if it is as bad as I say it is, then typical reactions are dramatically altered and you have to calculate a different response According to these different conditions.
 

Sailingman

New Member
What makes you so sure that the situation is as bad as you say it is? I agree that we have a problem on our hands, however I need a lot more than just your word to accept that our state is in such a dire condition. Please provide me with a few sites, or documents that show this trend. Thanks for your time!
-Ian
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
We have been producing since the paleolithic... what we need to do is work smarter. I have no doubt that it will get bad.. but we can't turn back the clock.

As you can see preaching doom isn't going to do anything productive.
The real question is... what are you doing in your life to reduce your impact on the planet?

wa:do
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
What makes you so sure that the situation is as bad as you say it is? I agree that we have a problem on our hands, however I need a lot more than just your word to accept that our state is in such a dire condition. Please provide me with a few sites, or documents that show this trend. Thanks for your time!
-Ian

That is one thing the paper asks of the reader, to read and study for themselves the situation with climate change. Find out from the horses mouth; the prognosis of the very elite science organizations is pretty horrific. Check out NASA, MIT, NOAA, NAS, most have pretty grim predictions. Then relate that to what is happening in government, put 2 and 2 together, you got this paper.

 

Danny Heim

Active Member
We have been producing since the paleolithic... what we need to do is work smarter. I have no doubt that it will get bad.. but we can't turn back the clock.

As you can see preaching doom isn't going to do anything productive.
The real question is... what are you doing in your life to reduce your impact on the planet?

wa:do

What you are saying there was true 20 years ago, not anymore. I am not preaching doom. I am preaching we make some decisons real freaking quick. What one is doing in their own life to help out should be a no brainer at this point, we are way beyond that. We need massive organzation going on. Study, learn.
 
Last edited:
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
What you are saying there was true 20 years ago, not anymore. I am not preaching doom. I am preaching we make some decisons real freaking quit.

quick?

edit: funny thing is you edited the post and didn't change that :biglaugh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
That is one thing the paper asks of the reader, to read and study for themselves the situation with climate change. Find out from the horses mouth; the prognosis of the very elite science organizations is pretty horrific. Check out NASA, MIT, NOAA, NAS, most have pretty grim predictions. Then relate that to what is happening in government, put 2 and 2 together, you got this paper.


The thing is, if you're making claims, the burden of proof is on you and not your reader. Besides, it gives you more credibility because we see that you're not making stuff up.

Even if you feel that it's beneath you or you've read it and don't remember where it is, it's a courtesy to provide at least a little proof. And this post isn't good enough. Referring the reader to a specific book, article, or even a link to news would be a real call in the paper for the reader to better educate themselves and perhaps even better understand your point of view.
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
What makes you so sure that the situation is as bad as you say it is? I agree that we have a problem on our hands, however I need a lot more than just your word to accept that our state is in such a dire condition. Please provide me with a few sites, or documents that show this trend. Thanks for your time!
-Ian
Most all of the issues i bring up regarding climate change, and I bring up many, can be copied and pasted into Google, you have all the info you need and much much more, in seconds. here's one, just Google "ocean acidification". that'l get you started
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
The thing is, if you're making claims, the burden of proof is on you and not your reader. Besides, it gives you more credibility because we see that you're not making stuff up.

Even if you feel that it's beneath you or you've read it and don't remember where it is, it's a courtesy to provide at least a little proof. And this post isn't good enough. Referring the reader to a specific book, article, or even a link to news would be a real call in the paper for the reader to better educate themselves and perhaps even better understand your point of view.

Oh believe me I know you are right and that's what we do. And believe it or not, I have this paper to an editor as we speak and she would kill me if she knew I was doing this. But I told her already I was a bit tired of all this and really didn't care if she edited this all that much. Also, the same goes for sourcing, plus, I would rather someone Google the many items I mention and then they get literally hundreds of sources. Oh hell, I am sure I’ll wind up sourcing all these some day and finishing this paper out, I hope not. Becasue you know, if that's what it takers to get people moving then we are going to wait a long time.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Oh believe me I know you are right and that's what we do. And believe it or not, I have this paper to an editor as we speak and she would kill me if she knew I was doing this. But I told her already I was a bit tired of all this and really didn't care if she edited this all that much. Also, the same goes for sourcing, plus, I would rather someone Google the many items I mention and then they get literally hundreds of sources. Oh hell, I am sure I’ll wind up sourcing all these some day and finishing this paper out, I hope not. Becasue you know, if that's what it takers to get people moving then we are going to wait a long time.

Yes, but if they don't use sources that you point them to, it's simply unlikely that your reader will come to the same conclusions that you did so easily.

[thereby negating the purpose of your paper]

In other words, don't assume that what's obvious to you is obvious to everyone else.
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
Here's what concerns me, there are all kinds of news sources out there regarding climate change. I mean tons and tons. What is going on is simple disbelief, because what you are reading is so fantastic, it's like you are in a movie, and you just can't believe it. Do you think sourcing is going to change that? Answer me this, just from listening out of the corner of your ear, hasn't the media at least tickled your curiosity to find out about climate change, what's really up?
 
Last edited:

Gloone

Well-Known Member
This sounds pretty archaic. Do you plan on using a whip or some other device to get your point across?
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
Yes, but if they don't use sources that you point them to, it's simply unlikely that your reader will come to the same conclusions that you did so easily.

[thereby negating the purpose of your paper]

In other words, don't assume that what's obvious to you is obvious to everyone else.
Well that's the point, by now, all this should be obvious to everyone. And I make that assumption because we don't have the time to do otherwise. In the time we've been typing our responses here, a person could have read 10 articles on any subject I mention in my paper with one Google. And actually, I thank you for talking about this, becasue that is exactly how I hoped to deal with the subject here, just like this, cool.
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
Well that's the point, by now, all this should be obvious to everyone. And I make that assumption because we don't have the time to do otherwise. In the time we've been typing our responses here, a person could have read 10 articles on any subject I mention in my paper with one Google. And actually, I thank you for talking about this, becasue that is exactly how I hoped to deal with the subject here, just like this, cool.

Actaully, I would hope you quit reading this thread, and get caught up in surfing climate change...do it for an hour, you'd be shocked.
 

Danny Heim

Active Member
This sounds pretty archaic. Do you plan on using a whip or some other device to get your point across?

I'm sorry if it comes off like that, but I am pretty sure it doesn't, I hope not. The only whip I hope one gets is the one they get from personally studying the issue of climate change. You see, that's the best way I learned about this issue, was to query for myself the questions "I" had, not someone elses questions, do that and do it long enough and you'll be writing an archaic paper yourself. :)

Here are five things to Google:
ice melts
climate change
coral reefs
food supply
desertification
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry if it comes off like that, but I am pretty sure it doesn't, I hope not. The only whip I hope one gets is the one they get from personally studying the issue of climate change. You see, that's the best way I learned about this issue, was to query for myself the questions "I" had, not someone elses questions, do that and do it long enough and you'll be writing an archaic paper yourself. :)

Here are five things to Google:
ice melts
climate change
coral reefs
food supply
desertification

i think the point is simply in protocol. if you are making the point, you should be making the effort. if you put enough effort to direct the readers of your thread in the right direction, then you clearly understand your point and you've done the leg work on your own. the internet being at our fingertips doesn't change protocol for the introduction of new ideas. you don't get out of backing up your claims with credible sources simply because Google and Wikipedia exist.

so just take a few minutes out of your day and compile the sources that go with your points. but always keep in mind, substantiating climate change does not substantiate ALL the claims in the OP. (so feel free to elaborate on them, or cite a source for your analysis.)
 
Top