Genna said:
I have seen all too many portraits of Jesus, the usual long-haired bearded man. Where does this depiction of him come from if the bible never describes his facial features?
And if some believe Jesus to be GOD, wouldn't making a portrait of him going against the 1st commandment, making a God in your image?
The image likely came from a shroud (which may or may not be the same one as the Shroud of Turin) called the Mandylion of Edessa. This was taken when the crusaders sacked Constantinople, but is referred to by St. John Damscene exactly when talking on this issue.
In actual fact, unless you consider the making of an image of any human being wrong, which it is clear from the catacombs and contemporary synagogues neither early Christians nor the Jews of the time did, then creating an image of Christ cannot be considered to break any commandment. Christ was Incarnate as man. He was fully man and fully God. From our point of view, then, the claim that you sometimes hear that we cannot make images of Christ because He is God are tantamount to a denial of the Incarnation and, hence, are un-Christian.
In any case, those who rail against images per se are mistaken. The Israelites in the OT also used images of angels and other things. This is not forbidden at all. It is the creation of an image in order to worship it as an idol that is forbidden.
James