I often liken faith in "the word of" god
to faith in "the word/s of" politicians.
"God is good"
yet we keep calling on "his" name in vain.
Expecting 'his' help for a better life.
"Politicians are good"
yet we keep voting them in, in vain.
'Expecting' their help,
for a better life.
For truth, and justice, and equality of opportunity.
Yet massive preponderance of evidence points against the case of faith in either.
The bulk of evidence clearly says you can't trust either. (god or politician)
Faith in the goodness and just interventional power of both god and politician is irrational.
Some of you will say, yes, I doubt the words of politicians,
but still I vote for them based on what they say.
Their platform, their promises...
Yes, even though I know what they say cannot be trusted.
(as we know from experience)
Is this rational?
Voting for someone you don't believe in,
(ie, someone who is not being REAL/not a real being)
makes perhaps worse sense than imploring a god for help
who lets little children starve daily.
(ie, politicians do the same. but for real.)
Don't know what you think of this kind of comparison.
Usually when I bring it up
it just gets ignored,
like I never wrote it.