Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Most Hindus I know don't really clearly know what they believe, yet they still act ethically according to dharma.
It's not really a philosophical religion at all, other that the few who go for that. In the west, because of the 'religious' paradigm Quintessence alluded to, people interested in Hinduism usually do it through philosophy first, often practically ignoring ethical action. Kind of sad, that, IMHO, as it sets up a gap between two groups.
Compassion is an action.
I think westerners(as converts) know more about Hindu philosophy because they studied it deeply and compared it with other religions before converting to Hinduism.
I believe it's a feeling first. The feeling does move one to action (as much as is possible). One may not be able to perform a compassionate act, yet still have the feeling. Of course, we might say "well, that's empathy or sympathy". As the Buddha said "Compassion is that which makes the heart of the good move at the pain of others. It crushes and destroys the pain of others; thus, it is called compassion. It is called compassion because it shelters and embraces the distressed."
I think westerners(as converts) know more about Hindu philosophy because they studied it deeply and compared it with other religions before converting to Hinduism.
I agree with you, it is a feeling.
What I am saying that it is useless to someone if he or she is suffering and I am able to stop the suffering but choose to just let the person suffer and just feel sorry for him or her, then that is not true compassion.
Absolutely... not only is that not compassion it is himsā, violence, and adharmic, the "wrong way".