It's a problem when one cannot see any merit on the other side.
This bespeaks fanaticism.
That would make you a fanatic, no???
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's a problem when one cannot see any merit on the other side.
This bespeaks fanaticism.
You don't read enuf.That would make you a fanatic, no???
You don't read enuf.
And you need a haircut.
But on the plus side, you alerted me to your response to my post.
That's like saying the Pope is slightly Catholic.Your avatar needs to take a shower!!
That would indeed be a tough challenge. Offhand, I can't think of anything positive he did...
Have Mexico pay for The Wall - didn't happen.
Bring back jobs in coal mines - didn't happen.
Bring back auto manufacturing - didn't happen.
Denigrate the Press - not positive.
Hurl insults like a second-grade bully - not positive.
Hire and fire many top-level staffers - not positive.
Hire a bunch of people who were subsequently convicted of an assortment of crimes - not positive.
Have Flynn lie to his VP Pence - not positive.
Gulp! Gee Mr. ingest, that would have been a really tough challenge. I'm sure glad you didn't propose it.
No. It bespeaks reality.It's a problem when one cannot see any merit on the other side.
This bespeaks fanaticism.
Therein lies the problem.No. It bespeaks reality.
It's a problem when one cannot see any merit on the other side.
This bespeaks fanaticism.
No. It bespeaks reality.
So, what shade of grey was your "fanaticism" comment?Therein lies the problem.
Reality is never black & white, entirely without the vast gray in between.
There will be no common ground for discussion if you're committed to that view.
But perhaps I'm wrong. Please list a few positive things you believe Trump has accomplished.
Things like appointing very Conservative SupremeCourt Justices obviously don't count because I don't believe striking down or weakening Roe v Wade would be positive.
You've already made it clear that you object to everything positive I've alreadyI figure it's worth asking again.