• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Father and daughter in sexual relationship go on TV

Skwim

Veteran Member
"It was too disturbed even for Jerry Springer.

So when the show rejected an 18-year-old girl who was having a sexual relationship with her father, there was only one person they could turn to - Steve Wilkos.
article-0-0C1E6C0C00000578-184_468x307.jpg

Recently the show aired a two-part story about a father - Morgan - and his biological daughter Britney, who reconnected through Myspace when she was 16 and started to have a relationship.

Britney explained to Steve Wilkos: 'I was 16 when I looked for him on Myspace. My family members had kept us apart and I hadn't seen him since I was seven so I looked him up.

'On my page I had pictures of my boobs and bum on there and when he saw it he said, "My little baby girl should not be doing that". But then he put a smiley face.

'When I saw that I thought he had sexual feelings for me.'

Wilkos asked her if she did not think that he was taking advantage of her and she said: 'No, because I wanted it too. I see a future with him. I have a really good feeling about us and I know it will work out.'"

source
So. . . portent of things to come, or is it just ♪ one of those things?
Just one of those crazy ♪ flings

One of those bells
♪ that now and then rings

Just one of those things?
♫
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friends,
Humans are a evolved species and have evolved in every aspect and today most evolved humans can distinguish between love and lust sex and incest however in evolution it is not necessary that every individual human should be in the same stage of evolution as we can see in this case.
As Steve said, he hopes that some day someone snaps his fingers to bring you out of this bad dream likewise would say it is for them to be conscious of their own acts to evolve.

Love & rgds
 

bhaktajan

Active Member
Well if the commandos show up and kill him ---there will be an outcry from civil-liberatians . . .as they did with Osama?
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Yeah, not buying it. Good story for shock tv though.

Yeah, the part in the thread is fairly believable, but reading the rest of the story, it's a little much. A father and 18-year-old daughter who just reconnected and are having a sexual relationship? OK, not that weird. Then two months later, she's worried she's pregnant only to reveal that she got pregnant by him on purpose, and only to find out that he's now cheating on her while she's at school? Sure, and the Nigerian prince is actually going to repay me $1 million after I wire him $1,000.
 

Vile Atheist

Loud and Obnoxious
I think people are missing the larger picture. The issue isn't whether or not this is real (it probably isn't, but I could be wrong). The issue is hypothetically, would your morals allow for this?

For me, as disgusting as I find it, if two consenting adults agree to have a sexual relationship, who am I to deprive them of that, even if it's a father-daughter relationship?

If this is real, or in any real-life situation where this occurs, I would have great reservations about the relative power of the father over the daughter, but as long as it's purely consentual and there is no abuse of power, I say let them have at it.

Just because you personally find something disgusting doesn't mean you have to do it if you find it permissible if someone else does. I find picking your nose and eating the boogers disgusting, but I don't think the law should have the power to prohibit that. Our society needs a baseline standard for how far the law can intrude into our lives. Personally, if the law doesn't serve to protect people, it isn't just. This is why I think, although I would never engage in a sexual relationship with another man, laws barring consenting gay adults from pursuing a meaningful relationship is a fundamental deprivation of their freedom.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I think people are missing the larger picture. The issue isn't whether or not this is real (it probably isn't, but I could be wrong). The issue is hypothetically, would your morals allow for this?

For me, as disgusting as I find it, if two consenting adults agree to have a sexual relationship, who am I to deprive them of that, even if it's a father-daughter relationship?

If this is real, or in any real-life situation where this occurs, I would have great reservations about the relative power of the father over the daughter, but as long as it's purely consentual and there is no abuse of power, I say let them have at it.

Just because you personally find something disgusting doesn't mean you have to do it if you find it permissible if someone else does. I find picking your nose and eating the boogers disgusting, but I don't think the law should have the power to prohibit that. Our society needs a baseline standard for how far the law can intrude into our lives. Personally, if the law doesn't serve to protect people, it isn't just. This is why I think, although I would never engage in a sexual relationship with another man, laws barring consenting gay adults from pursuing a meaningful relationship is a fundamental deprivation of their freedom.

While I think that people should have the freedom as along as everyone involved are consenting adults and no ones rights are violated in the process, I would still strongly advise against it as it's extremely psychologically unhealthy, especially when some of those involved are of very questionable character. There's also the issue of potential inbred mutant babies.
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
I think people are missing the larger picture. The issue isn't whether or not this is real (it probably isn't, but I could be wrong). The issue is hypothetically, would your morals allow for this?

For me, as disgusting as I find it, if two consenting adults agree to have a sexual relationship, who am I to deprive them of that, even if it's a father-daughter relationship?

If this is real, or in any real-life situation where this occurs, I would have great reservations about the relative power of the father over the daughter, but as long as it's purely consentual and there is no abuse of power, I say let them have at it.

Just because you personally find something disgusting doesn't mean you have to do it if you find it permissible if someone else does. I find picking your nose and eating the boogers disgusting, but I don't think the law should have the power to prohibit that. Our society needs a baseline standard for how far the law can intrude into our lives. Personally, if the law doesn't serve to protect people, it isn't just. This is why I think, although I would never engage in a sexual relationship with another man, laws barring consenting gay adults from pursuing a meaningful relationship is a fundamental deprivation of their freedom.

That's why I was thinking it sounded like an Alan Abel hoax. He would set up hoaxes to show how the media would fail to vet outrageous claims before presenting them to the public. As well, he would also put out these hoaxes as a way to challenge the public including a campaign to ban breastfeeding and acting as a professional panhandler during one recession.

He also, inadvertently, helped start the trend of daytime talk shows turning into circuses of bizarre people. Noting how someone claiming something outrageous would be a better draw than a real story shows like Jerry Springer producers would just hire actors to be these outrageous characters on a talk show.

But you are right. There is often a fundamental argument that can be derived from these things even if they are a stunt for shock value.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I think people are missing the larger picture. The issue isn't whether or not this is real (it probably isn't, but I could be wrong). The issue is hypothetically, would your morals allow for this?

For me, as disgusting as I find it, if two consenting adults agree to have a sexual relationship, who am I to deprive them of that, even if it's a father-daughter relationship?

If this is real, or in any real-life situation where this occurs, I would have great reservations about the relative power of the father over the daughter, but as long as it's purely consentual and there is no abuse of power, I say let them have at it.

Just because you personally find something disgusting doesn't mean you have to do it if you find it permissible if someone else does. I find picking your nose and eating the boogers disgusting, but I don't think the law should have the power to prohibit that. Our society needs a baseline standard for how far the law can intrude into our lives. Personally, if the law doesn't serve to protect people, it isn't just. This is why I think, although I would never engage in a sexual relationship with another man, laws barring consenting gay adults from pursuing a meaningful relationship is a fundamental deprivation of their freedom.
I agree. All possible side issues taken care of (No possibility of pregnancy. No untoward psychological consequences. No power factors at work.) and the relationship is fully consensual, I see no reason to consider it unlawful or even immoral.
 

Vile Atheist

Loud and Obnoxious
While I think that people should have the freedom as along as everyone involved are consenting adults and no ones rights are violated in the process, I would still strongly advise against it as it's extremely psychologically unhealthy, especially when some of those involved are of very questionable character. There's also the issue of potential inbred mutant babies.

I agree. I would probably advise against it too. But my feelings or yours are irrelevant to the question of whether or not society should allow them the freedom to pursue a consentual sexual relationship as father and daughter.
 
Top