• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Favorite prominent atheist?

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Is it somehow more respectful to refrain from calling God-belief a delusion while still believing it so than to be honest about it?

I guess many people think so. I happen to disagree.

At the very least, I think that if others have the right to tell me that I must believe in God than that necessarily entitles me to disagree with then, therefore at least implicitly calling them delluded in this matter.
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
No, disagreement does not imply that you think they're deluded. Disagreement means you think they're wrong. Not the same thing.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
But still. So many religions explicitly think of each other as deluded about the nature and existence of God.

Why is it so much different and worse for an Atheist to call belief in God a delusion than it is, say, for Protestants, Muslims and Catholics to effectively believe each other group to be deluded about who exactly can speak in God's name?
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
But still. So many religions explicitly think of each other as deluded about the nature and existence of God.

Why is it so much different and worse for an Atheist to call belief in God a delusion than it is, say, for Protestants, Muslims and Catholics to effectively believe each other group to be deluded about who exactly can speak in God's name?
They say no such thing. They say the others are wrong. Wrong =/= deluded. I don't take offense when an atheist says I'm wrong. I take offense when anyone maligns my sanity. Why is that so hard to understand?
 

linwood

Well-Known Member
They say no such thing. They say the others are wrong. Wrong =/= deluded. I don't take offense when an atheist says I'm wrong. I take offense when anyone maligns my sanity. Why is that so hard to understand?

Why is it so hard to understand that a single incidence of delusion does not make one "insane"?

We`ve been over this before Storm, delusion "can be" a part of a mental disorder diagnosis BUT it doesn`t have to.

Perfectly sane people have delusions about different things.
I`ve been deluded myself, hell I very well may be deluded about something right now.

Doesn`t mean I`m insane.
Does it?

de⋅lu⋅sion


  1. A false belief or opinion: labored under the delusion that success was at hand.
  2. Psychiatry A false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom of mental illness: delusions of persecution.
I think you`re deluded about the meaning of delusion.

:p

Edit:

We are now really off topic.
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
Even the milder definition specifies falsehood. If an opinion cannot be demonstrated to be false, it is not delusion.
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
Not just a famous person who happens to be an atheist, but one who is known primarily for his or her atheism, kwim?

I especially like Richard Dawkins and his nonabrasive style. Michael Shermer is a close second.

Michael Shermer.

The problem with the question is that many known for their atheism are known in a negative light by too many and the media. Dawkins, Hitchens, etc. Shermer is known, by those who actually knows who he is, for his work with Skeptic magazine and that field primarily tackling pseudoscience and the paranormal along with such individuals as Joe Nickell and James Randi. I think even fewer no him for his debates on religion which are very good.

I recall the title of The God Delusion originated with the publisher rather than with Dawkins.

I don't know about his book but the documentary "Root of All Evil" was definitely a work in which the title was put forth by Channel 4 and not by Dawkins. I believe the title of the book came from the first part of that documentary as it examines that part in greater detail.
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
I've heard the name, but can't place it. Why don't you tell me about her?

She was notorious to many Christians in this country for fighting to have prayer and bible readings removed from public schools. She was a rather outspoken atheist and some would say not the most kindly. She was also the founder of American Atheists.

I misspelled her name, too.

http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/Her and her adult sons disappearedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O'Hair
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
She was notorious to many Christians in this country for fighting to have prayer and bible readings removed from public schools. She was a rather outspoken atheist and some would say not the most kindly. She was also the founder of American Atheists.

I misspelled her name, too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O%27Hair
Well, while I laud her activism and accopmlishments, after reading the article, particularly the comments of her son, I can't say as I admire her personally.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Not just a famous person who happens to be an atheist, but one who is known primarily for his or her atheism, kwim?

Atheism seems a pretty silly thing to primarily be known for. Then again, I've never been overly impressed with pundits, talking heads, or philosophers in general.
 

JeLy

Member
(All obvious choices of Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, etc. aside)
Carl Sagan - Astronomer/Educator (creator of The Cosmos tv program)
James Randi - Skeptic/Conjuror whom I met at the first Carl Sagan Day last month.
Jerry Coyne - Evolutionary Biologist
Lawrence Krauss - Cosmologist
The "cast" of The Atheist Experience - Austin, TX tv show/podcast
PZ Myers - Biologist and blogger
 
Top