Wasn't that statement his way of proving he was alive or conscious?
It was meant to support Solipsism, he was the one who stated that the only thing you know is that you are alive (hence I think therefore I am)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wasn't that statement his way of proving he was alive or conscious?
It was meant to support Solipsism, he was the one who stated that the only thing you know is that you are alive (hence I think therefore I am)
Actually, Descartes is quite explicitly arguing against such skepticism. Although the actual phrase cogito ergo sum does not appear in the Meditatio II, the argument does. It is an argument against the impossibility of epistemology and absolute skepticism. Descartes addresses this possibility by asking whether some God (aliquis Deus) or something/someone (quocun) is capable of constructing a universe of experience and perception so completely false that nothing whatsoever could be known. He answers this by turning skepticism on itself: "Haud dubie igitur ego etiam sum, si me fallit/At any rate I, at least, consequently am, if [as] I am deceived."It was meant to support Solipsism, he was the one who stated that the only thing you know is that you are alive (hence I think therefore I am)
It was meant to support Solipsism, he was the one who stated that the only thing you know is that you are alive (hence I think therefore I am)
Confucius
"Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life."