FBI raids Trump's Mar-A-Lago Estate!

[fantome profane]

An extra "Trump" snuck in there.

Thank you very much for those nightmares!

 

[Revoltingest]

Thank you very much for those nightmares!

Would you like more "Trump" insertions?
I can provide.
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump

 

[Suave]

I am responding to @Suave who said:

Good luck with trying to get Trump back into the White House as our duly elected POTUS if he were locked behind bars in jail where he'd be lawfully placed for having violated the Presidential Records Act. ...

 

[Revoltingest]

Good luck with trying to get Trump back into the White House as our duly elected POTUS if he were locked behind bars in jail where he'd be lawfully placed for having violated the Presidential Records Act. ...

Could conviction & prison possibly not stand
in Trump's way of winning the 2024 election?
Or at least claiming that it was stolen from
him....again?

 

[Wildswanderer]

The FBI has now raided former POTUS Donald Trump's home, the Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. I'm confident they will find evidence there showing Donald Trump purposefully incited the January 6th riot against the Capitol!

What exactly are you expecting them to find?
A signed confession?

 

[Suave]

Could conviction & prison possibly not stand
in Trump's way of winning the 2024 election?
Or at least claiming that it was stolen from
him....again?

 

[Suave]

What exactly are you expecting them to find?
A signed confession?

We should expect to find Trump had violated the Presidential Records Act by mishandling highly classified documents improperly stored in Trump's home.

 

[Suave]

Would you like more "Trump" insertions?
I can provide.
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump

Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!

 

[fantome profane]

Would you like more "Trump" insertions?
I can provide.
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump

You have now used up your yearly allotment for that word. You can not say that again till August 2023.


Unless you are playing bridge.

 

[Wildswanderer]

We should expect to find Trump had violated the Presidential Records Act by mishandling highly classified documents improperly stored in Trump's home.

How would that relate to January 6th?

 

[Suave]

How would that relate to January 6th?

That'd be another reason to lock him up! ...

 

[Wildswanderer]

That'd be another reason to lock him up! ...

So this isn't about finding evidence that he invited a " coup"? I guess that just the official story?

 

[fantome profane]

So this isn't about finding evidence that he invited a " coup"? I guess that just the official story?

Who said this raid was about Jan 6th.

How bizarre is it when an ex-President has his home searched and it could be due to any one of a dozen possible crimes?

 

[Suave]

So this isn't about finding evidence that he invited a " coup"? I guess that just the official story?

Whether he is officially convicted for having incited an insurrection or is officially convicted for having violated the Presidential Records Act, Trump gets caged, and we win by surely keeping this orangutan-like ape from returning to the White House!

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Whether he is officially convicted for having incited an insurrection or is officially convicted for having violated the Presidential Records Act, Trump gets caged, ...

Fortunately for you, baseless certainty is not a punishable offense.

• You are absolutely certain that he will be indicted.
• You are absolutely certain that efforts to delay and politicize the trial will fail.
• You are absolutely certain that, despite a massive misinformation campaig, he will be convicted.
• you are absolutely certain that, either, he will not appeal or the appeal will fail.
• And you are absolutely certain that, in the meantime, Trump forces will not take the Presidency and, perhaps, the Senate.

I guess we have noting to worry about.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'm not telling you that you have to believe Eric, but these are the facts as they are currently known. Let's see a receipt of items taken.



It is protocol. But the word of all who were there has been, thus far, that a copy was shown (but not before searching) and was not left. Trump's lawyers have confirmed that they don't have a copy and they want a copy.

Interestingly, Merrick Garland stated that a copy of both the warrant and the receipt were left.



It looks like Merrick Garland, who admitted to signing off on the raid, has succumbed to pressure (from numerous watchdog groups) to release the warrant and Trump responded, publically, that he wants it released immediately - not that you at any point believed Trump. The only thing Merrick Garland's DOJ isn't willing to do is show the affadavit.

It's not my fault if you blindly believed without having seen warrant or receipt (or affadavit) or public statement from the DOJ and disbelieved what Trump, his family, and his lawyers stated publically.

Trump has a very poor record when it comes to telling the Truth. Why would anyone believe him?

 

[metis]

I'm not telling you that you have to believe Eric, but these are the facts as they are currently known.

The only "fact" is that Eric said it. Whether he was telling the truth or not may or may not be.

Trump's lawyers have confirmed that they don't have a copy and they want a copy.

Then they lied as the lawyers have been going over whether the warrant should be released to the public.

not that you at any point believed Trump.

I all so often question him but I don't assume that he's lying.

It's not my fault if you blindly believed without having seen warrant or receipt (or affadavit) or public statement from the DOJ and disbelieved what Trump, his family, and his lawyers stated publically.

Are you getting the above trash from the likes of Fox, another source, or do you just prone to inventing stuff? I am not assuming anything, but you certainly are. Thus, you destroy your own position through attributing the worst in regard to what I post, which I don't do to you.

 

[Ponder This]

Are you getting the above trash from the likes of Fox, another source, or do you just prone to inventing stuff? I am not assuming anything, but you certainly are. Thus, you destroy your own position through attributing the worst in regard to what I post, which I don't do to you.

You just attributed the worst to Fox and assumed that I only listen to the likes of Fox (which I've rarely cited as a source on RF). In fact, I cited the Washington Examiner - not Fox - to you with regard to Eric (not there wasn't plenty of coverage on just about any news source when you claimed you hadn't seen it reported). Do you not listen to a variety of news sources? Or do you avoid some news sources because of your trash opinion of them?

For example, I listened to Merrick Garland's speech in its entirety via NBC. My opinion about NBC's commentary as a news source was secondary, because I was able to watch Merrick Garland speak in entirety - not paraphrased or edited.

 

[Ponder This]

Good luck with trying to get Trump back into the White House as our duly elected POTUS if he were locked behind bars in jail where he'd be lawfully placed for having violated the Presidential Records Act. ...

He could set a new record by winning the Presidency as a convicted felon!

 

[Suave]

He could set a new record by winning the Presidency as a convicted felon!

Please note if Trump were convicted of willfully and unlawfully removing government documents, he would be legally prohibited from holding any office under the United States, including the Presidency,

18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.