Heyo
Veteran Member
Of course it is. Put the corporations in the cage and let the people out.I like to think this can be accomplished without having people put in a regulatory and legislative cage.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course it is. Put the corporations in the cage and let the people out.I like to think this can be accomplished without having people put in a regulatory and legislative cage.
Read it and find, in my opinion, that the judge got it wrong.
Well, I shall hope that your opinion does not have any particular authority in any jurisdiction.Read it and find, in my opinion, that the judge got it wrong.
Case closed.
Historically, when this has been done, the middle class has expanded and general prosperity has increased.Of course it is. Put the corporations in the cage and let the people out.
Serious question:No it isn't.
Look at New York and California and you tell me who the authoritarians are.
Because compulsory policymaking curtails people's economic and personal freedoms. Anybody like that is authoritarian. It dosent need to be extreme like Russia, but it's authoritarian all the same.Serious question:
How in the bloody hell can you believe New York and California are authoritarian when you know of the existence of and policies of those such as Putin and Xi?
I vote.Well, I shall hope that your opinion does not have any particular authority in any jurisdiction.
We get more say over here with ballot initiatives and special elections than they get in Indiana (now, talk about a state with compulsory policymaking - you rarely get to vote on it there).Because compulsory policymaking curtails people's economic and personal freedoms. Anybody like that is authoritarian. It dosent need to be extreme like Russia, but it's authoritarian all the same.
So you recommend no policies, and no bars at all to people's economic and personal freedoms?Because compulsory policymaking curtails people's economic and personal freedoms. Anybody like that is authoritarian. It dosent need to be extreme like Russia, but it's authoritarian all the same.
Oh, or like Mike Pence. When he was governor of Indiana gays were given the right to wed but he still fought to keep it out and curtail granted and entitled rights to a select group of people.Because compulsory policymaking curtails people's economic and personal freedoms. Anybody like that is authoritarian. It dosent need to be extreme like Russia, but it's authoritarian all the same.
DST says it all about how whackass those claims are. Mitch Daniels forced it on Indiana. There was no vote by the People. The Prozac Wanker who helped curse us with the over prescription of anti-depressants for things theh won't work for also cursed Indiana with DST when he forced it on the state. California on the other hand voted decades ago to enact it and again a few years ago we voted to have our state end changing the clock. That's two votes of the People on the subject compared to a big, fat zero if that Conservative hellhole of Indiana that CATO loves and ranks very free (CATO seems to not mind Indiana is the most generous state when it comes to corporate welfare while the People contend with roads so bad that Indianapolis is getting sued over its potholes).So you recommend no policies, and no bars at all to people's economic and personal freedoms?
Let’s hope you will always be able to.I vote.
No poblem unless we get taken over by a country like ChinaLet’s hope you will always be able to.
I'm sure some who wholesale lost that right in the past thought similar.No poblem unless we get taken over by a country like China
And just who would that be?I'm sure some who wholesale lost that right in the past thought similar.
Yet they just keep on doing it. Both sides.Oh, or like Mike Pence. When he was governor of Indiana gays were given the right to wed but he still fought to keep it out and curtail granted and entitled rights to a select group of people.