• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Federal proposal for 32-hour workweek gets traction in Congress

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Four days on, three days off. On these three off days you have other employees come into work.
You could have your company running 7 days a week. If your business model is profitable then running it seven days a week should just make it more profitable to cover the additional workers.
You could have a day/night shift to cover that fourth day. Or offer one group a 24 hour work week.

168 hours in a week. Lots of ways to fit 32 hour weekly shifts into that. Just got to let go of 9 to 5, Monday thru Friday.
It's exactly what I have. 4 days on, three days off. My company is doing extremely well I might add and employee moral is excellent here.

They also offer the frequent option of a fith day at overtime if desired on top of that. It makes for a wonderful variety.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It seems to have worked well for other countries who have tried it. I think U.S. employers will try to block it, though.
I agree but the good news is there are companies that willingly offer a shorter work week out there, and proves that a five day work week is not a nessessity to remain profitable.

I do agree a shorter work week at 32 hours likely would not fly over here. Maybe if automation takes traction as the company I work at has robotics on the floor, which helps, but I still need to work 40 hours nonetheless.

Two extra hours a day dosent bother me too much though as long as it remains 4 days.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Some workers cannot divide up their tasks into the same
work using more workers efficiently, eg, engineers.
Overhead increases with the number of workers.
Places I've worked would rather pay me overtime
to get more done than hire new help, who'd have
to be brought up to speed, & would have to work
simultaneously to be useful...meaning more facility
space would be needed.
Lawmakers typically don't understand the economics,
or they just don't care. Their primary goal is winning
votes to stay in office.

I'm optimistic that business management folks are smarter then the politicians.
Whatever laws government comes up with, the business side will find ways to work it to their benefit.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm optimistic that business management folks are smarter then the politicians.
Whatever laws government comes up with, the business side will find ways to work it to their benefit.
Some policies have better effects than others.
It's unwise to not consider all the possible ones.
Optimize policies for the best balance of them all,
& beware unintended consequences.
 
Many people can't make it on 40 hours but would get overtime over 32 hours..
What are your thoughts on this?

"This week, the Congressional Progressive Caucus with nearly 100 lawmakers endorsed a bill that would cut the work week from 40 to 32 hours. The bill would require overtime pay after 32 hours."

Story here..
Federal proposal for 32-hour workweek gets traction in Congress

I will think really hard to push this through, 32 hours??????????????????? I'll have my best life always
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I like it. I have a four day week at ten hour days and it has done wonders for the proverbial mind and soul. Of course a 32 hour week would be welcome as well if it's at full pay, but I still want four days.

Other countries do it and has very good results and has not impacted prosperity in the least.

I would think not many will work you over 32 hours if its overtime.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I would think not many will work you over 32 hours if its overtime.
I agree. In the states, the mindset is still set on working people for 40 hours at regular pay before overtime kicks in.

Overtime after 32 is going to be a hard sell here.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
It seems to have worked well for other countries who have tried it. I think U.S. employers will try to block it, though.
Almost all mandates/adjustments from the federal level experience resistance. I agree, this will be no different.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I personally fail to understand why the work week is so incredibly short already and people still want to make it shorter?

Reading both of those things I feel like I am insane and not understanding a lot of information because working four days a week sounds degrading to me and not human. I am confused as to what the benefits are. I need to study more, studying things has no end.
Your perspective is unique, I haven't heard this before. Why does it make you feel less human? (Not trying to pick a fight, im genuinely curious.)
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
See, I've always thought I could have a great life if not for the need to work for a living.

People specialize for efficiency. There is usually a demand for you to increase your efficiency in your role so there is little time left to expand into other ways to contribute. I have many interests but in working for someone else, these are not something I get paid for.

Art, music, literature, engineering, Maybe I'd be good at it, maybe not. Still extra time to find other ways to contribute.
You know what really helped me here? I got lucky and found a job where I could work from home. That opened up more time for me to explore hobbies. I understand not everyone has this opportunity but I recommend it to anyone to try.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I suppose if people spend said extra time in other work as you mention here then it'd all work out, although I don't really expect much from folks in this nation in doing that.
Maybe, but I see your point, Personally? I would want to find some way to contribute as well. If I had a 32 hour work week I would begin investigating volunteering or maybe another weekend gig doing something that may pay less but I would enjoy more.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
I personally fail to understand why the work week is so incredibly short already and people still want to make it shorter?

Reading both of those things I feel like I am insane and not understanding a lot of information because working four days a week sounds degrading to me and not human. I am confused as to what the benefits are. I need to study more, studying things has no end.

If you don't understand why people would want to work less.... Yes, you are insane.

It is one of those things we are not supposed to explain.... If we have to, there is some major underlying issue.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Some workers cannot divide up their tasks into the same
work using more workers efficiently, eg, engineers.
Overhead increases with the number of workers.
Places I've worked would rather pay me overtime
to get more done than hire new help, who'd have
to be brought up to speed, & would have to work
simultaneously to be useful...meaning more facility
space would be needed.
Lawmakers typically don't understand the economics,
or they just don't care. Their primary goal is winning
votes to stay in office.

Yeah...
It is one of those things that would be great... If it worked.... but life is not so simple. Here is me hoping some major research is done before something like this becomes the law.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
6 days a week with 10 hour days actually sounds like a good work week to me.
Oh, really? You can have my job. Have fun. Enjoy your body breaking down in a few years. See how much of a "blessing" or "divine gift" you think it is. I mean, seriously. Have you ever worked retail or done a physical job?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
It sounds like it may not work here, not for long.

Did anybody see John Oliver's last show about unions this year? The real fix (more permanent) could be protecting and reinvigorating unions. Unions have little or no protection these days when they are forming, so workers have very little representation in franchised companies. Unions could fix most problems about hours and wages. Also if unions were in action then shorter work weeks might be effective, but without a dynamic representative for workers a rule change is unlikely to do what it is intended to do. 'Dynamic' means "Responding quickly to conditions." Congress isn't dynamic, so business will quickly antiquate and make ineffective any measures it comes up with. That's why we have the Fed. Congress is not dynamic or effective in dealing with business.
 
Top