Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course. But infallibility is rather a red herring, isn’t it? The ancients weren’t concerned with word-for-word copying. Much of this was in the form of oral transmission for centuries before anything was written down. We know that a lot of the OT stuff was “borrowed” from other cultures and earlier religions. The Synoptics were likely oral stories before being written down.Here is my first point.
It is dishonest to call the contents
of a book infallible scripture given
by inspiration of God, when you
actually believe that only the original
autographs were infallible scripture
given by inspiration of God.
There are no original autographs.
There never was an original Bible containing the original autographs.
Also lifted verbatim from another site.There is no such thing as
" the bible " .
There are hundreds of Bibles
which do not match in content,
volume or doctrine.
That’s incongruent with your posts on other forums.I am not a KJV Only.
I am not an Original Only.
I believe all scripture is given
by inspiration of God.
I believe the Lord preserved his words
and purified them in a furnace of earth,
seven times.
You’re creating straw men. All of this is largely fantasy.It is dishonest to call a book
infallible scripture given by
inspiration of God, when you actually
believe that only the original autographs
were infallible scripture given by
inspiration of God.
KJV by good words and fair speeches
deceive the hearts of the simple
You’re obfuscating. You know what I mean.There is no such thing as " the bible " .
There are over 300 English Bibles
which do not match in content,
volume or doctrine. Additionally,
there are billions of bibles.
Be sincere.
What book are you calling " the bible " ?
Don’t prevaricate. You know what a Bible is. A Bible is any of the collections of canonized texts, in various translations.No seriously, no name calling.
Be sincere. What book are you
calling " the bible " ?
How could the Bible be a higher authority than the body that canonized the Bible?I believe the Bible, God's Word is the final authority.
Which groups do you think proclaim "sola ecclesia?"Sola Scriptura vs. Sola Ecclesia
FYI: using the quote function will let people know who you're replying to.Please read the previous posts.
Who decided what are and aren't "the words of the Lord?" The church.Psalm 12:6-7
6 The words of the Lord are pure words
as silver tried in a furnace of earth
purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them O Lord,
thou shalt preserve them from
this generation for ever.
The Lord preserved his words,
not the church, and purified them
seven times.
Which groups do you think proclaim "sola ecclesia?"
(The Catholic Church proclaims prima scriptura)
Because Protestant churches don't fall short of the standard they set for themselves?They proclaim that maybe, but they don't necessarily follow it.
I see a lot of pastor-fawning in other churches, too.Alot of Catholics almost fawn over the Pope, which btw is deeply heretical. Jesus is our High Priest.
Which ex cathedra declarations do you think are contrary to the Gospels? There are very few ex cathedra statements, so I trust you had a specific one in mind... right?And Galatians 1:8-9 warns us that anyone declaring something contrary to the Gospel is under a curse! What do you think the Pope does every time they invoke papal infallibility?