• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Final Authority

James2028

Member
There is no such thing as " the bible " .

There are over 300 English Bibles
which do not match in content,
volume or doctrine. Additionally,
there are billions of bibles.

Be sincere.
What book are you calling " the bible " ?
 
Last edited:

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Here is my first point.
It is dishonest to call the contents
of a book infallible scripture given
by inspiration of God, when you
actually believe that only the original
autographs were infallible scripture
given by inspiration of God.

There are no original autographs.
There never was an original Bible containing the original autographs.
Of course. But infallibility is rather a red herring, isn’t it? The ancients weren’t concerned with word-for-word copying. Much of this was in the form of oral transmission for centuries before anything was written down. We know that a lot of the OT stuff was “borrowed” from other cultures and earlier religions. The Synoptics were likely oral stories before being written down.

This stuff was never meant to be infallible. Infallibility as a criterion tortures the texts.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
There is no such thing as
" the bible " .

There are hundreds of Bibles
which do not match in content,
volume or doctrine.
Also lifted verbatim from another site.
“The Bible” depends on which canon one is referring to. “The Bible” is largely an ideal, rather than a specific, literary object.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I am not a KJV Only.
I am not an Original Only.
I believe all scripture is given
by inspiration of God.
I believe the Lord preserved his words
and purified them in a furnace of earth,
seven times.
That’s incongruent with your posts on other forums.

What you “believe” is irrelevant. What “is” is what matters.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
It is dishonest to call a book
infallible scripture given by
inspiration of God, when you actually
believe that only the original autographs
were infallible scripture given by
inspiration of God.
KJV by good words and fair speeches
deceive the hearts of the simple
You’re creating straw men. All of this is largely fantasy.

I think you’re largely making stuff up as you go along, based on your other interactions elsewhere. I believe I detect troll smell...
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
There is no such thing as " the bible " .

There are over 300 English Bibles
which do not match in content,
volume or doctrine. Additionally,
there are billions of bibles.

Be sincere.
What book are you calling " the bible " ?
You’re obfuscating. You know what I mean.
 

James2028

Member
No, not a Bible, you said " the bible " .
Be sincere. Do you mean a mystical
non existent original Bible or a real book ?
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
I already know exactly what you mean.
A mystical non existent book, just like superstitious transubstantiation.
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
I've completed eighth year theology
courses at both Catholic and Baptist
Seminaries. There are two lines of Bibles, Syrian and Alexandrian. They do not match in content, volume or doctrine.
 

James2028

Member
Please read the previous posts.

Psalm 12:6-7
6 The words of the Lord are pure words
as silver tried in a furnace of earth
purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them O Lord,
thou shalt preserve them from
this generation for ever.


The Lord preserved his words,
not the church, and purified them
seven times.
 

James2028

Member
Catholicism teaches that popes
speak excathedra, infallible.
The precedence is given to
Codex Vaticanus with sitzimleben
hermeneutics.
 

James2028

Member
The critical issue is salvation.

Catholicism teaches that salvation
is through the Catholic sacraments.

The scriptures teach that salvation
is by grace through faith alone.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
We are talking about 'translations'.
So, one is saying, the translations is the best, or such.

I like, as far as I have read, at least one other translation, that seems very correct my estimation, so is that sola scriptura? Some of the verses are worded differently.

 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Please read the previous posts.
FYI: using the quote function will let people know who you're replying to.

Psalm 12:6-7
6 The words of the Lord are pure words
as silver tried in a furnace of earth
purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them O Lord,
thou shalt preserve them from
this generation for ever.


The Lord preserved his words,
not the church, and purified them
seven times.
Who decided what are and aren't "the words of the Lord?" The church.

Who actually did the work to preserve them? The church.

If you want to argue that it was the Lord who guided the church to do these things, I don't see why this would imply why we should give less regard to the church.
 

Samantha Rinne

Resident Genderfluid Writer/Artist
Which groups do you think proclaim "sola ecclesia?"

(The Catholic Church proclaims prima scriptura)

They proclaim that maybe, but they don't necessarily follow it. Alot of Catholics almost fawn over the Pope, which btw is deeply heretical. Jesus is our High Priest. And Galatians 1:8-9 warns us that anyone declaring something contrary to the Gospel is under a curse! What do you think the Pope does every time they invoke papal infallibility?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
They proclaim that maybe, but they don't necessarily follow it.
Because Protestant churches don't fall short of the standard they set for themselves?

Alot of Catholics almost fawn over the Pope, which btw is deeply heretical. Jesus is our High Priest.
I see a lot of pastor-fawning in other churches, too.

Jesus also condemned focusing on the daults of others, but here you are pointing out motes in the eye of the Catholic Church. Do you think we'd find a beam in your eye if we judged you?


And Galatians 1:8-9 warns us that anyone declaring something contrary to the Gospel is under a curse! What do you think the Pope does every time they invoke papal infallibility?
Which ex cathedra declarations do you think are contrary to the Gospels? There are very few ex cathedra statements, so I trust you had a specific one in mind... right?
 
Top