I know that's an important aspect of it for Catholics, but do you think it overlooks or often misses anything?
Well, I doubt that I understood the real significance of such images when I first gazed up at them as a child. Yet they
were very striking images, as I'm sure you'd agree. One doesn't forget them in a hurry.
As I a grew up, I kept coming back to them: in some sense they stayed with me.
I don't know, I feel they
do grasp something of the emotive power of the passion of Christ. They don't proclaim anything especially theological in nature (i.e. atonement doctrines, vicarious justice) or the like.
Rather the attention is shifted down to a very human, moving level which I imagine a lot of people can relate to.
The naked, dejected man nailed to the cross: his head bent over in the peace of death after the torture he has had to endure. No loin cloth in this sculpture to hide Christ's genitals, to spare him humiliation and play to religious sensibility about the body. (The nudity of the figure is true to the Gospels.)
The grieving mother trying to stay strong and impassive while her left hand, turned upward in helpless resignation, betrays her true feelings...I think it's
beautiful and
subtle.
Here the human aspects of Jesus' story were put on display, not the spiritual.
And I like that. I always have.