Can you explain a bit more what you mean here?
I have also laid this out all nice for you too.
Say reasoning is on one side of the wall and is labeled as “a”. The objective basis is on the outside of the wall and is labeled as “b”.
“a” || “b”
You know what an objective basis because you already know what is on the other side of the wall. But it doesn’t matter, because you have already formulated an opinion that it is outside our sensory world.
The reason “b” isn’t rational is because you don’t know what is on the other side of the wall. So when you look over it all you see is a “p”
“a” || “p”
If you knew “b” was on the other side of the wall it would be practical. But since you don’t know what is on the other side of the wall and haven’t looked. All you see is..
“a” || “a”.
But if you were given a clue beforehand that something is actually on the other side of the wall it doesn’t matter what is on the side.
“a” || *
Because you already know and you can make it whatever you want.
So it might not be practical. But may be possible.
It is kind of like saying the moon is red.
But no one really knows why the moon is red, it just is.
It could mean a lot of things outside of the sensory world or it could mean absolutely nothing at all, but science may have an explanation for it that is unrelated.
So any information in this world is unrelated to that outside of the sensory world. So how do you base reason, logic and other things around something that you are unaware of unless you know that things outside of the sensory world exist.