Given the fact that the ancients referred to the skies as " the seas " I don't think it's all that strange
Not in one bit
The phases of the moon were the " floodwaters " rising up and submerging it, then receding again to reveal it
These topics are not that difficult to understand with some study, I think it's just that people have their ideas and they are stuck on them
Me personally ?
I've studied and traced the topic from the earliest Sumerian city-states, using widely available peer-reviewed materials, all the way through Akkadians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Egyptians, etc,
Not just the languages and terminology, but the evolution of the specific terms and symbols / logograms / cuneiform used for astronomy
Not just astronomy, but mathematical astronomy handed down SOLELY by oral tradition in most cases, through the priesthoods
Then I learned the modern equations, and did a step-by-step comparison to the ancient methods, to show them as approximately identical
But I'm getting ahead of myself
Allow me to throw another dog leg in the mix
The Sumerian King's List, another object of my studies:
" After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28,800 years. Alaljar ruled for 36,000 years. 2 kings; they ruled for 64,800 years. Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira. In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43,200 years. En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28,800 years. Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36,000 years. 3 kings; they ruled for 108,000 years. Then Bad-tibira fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Larag. In Larag, En-sipad-zid-ana ruled for 28,800 years. 1 king; he ruled for 28,800 years. Then Larag fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Zimbir. In Zimbir, En-men-dur-ana became king; he ruled for 21,000 years. 1 king; he ruled for 21,000 years. Then Zimbir fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Curuppag. In Curuppag, Ubara-Tutu became king; he ruled for 18,600 years. 1 king; he ruled for 18,600 years. In 5 cities 8 kings; they ruled for 241,200 years. Then the flood swept over' "
A " year " was counted as a " sar "
A " sar " as a number = 3600
This is the same as the Babylonian " saru ", which lends it's name to the Saros eclipse cycle { Borrowed by Greek mathematical astronomers - they had no notations of their own and used Babylonian et al }
sar = 3600 = saru
The " saru " { 3600 } is simply a term used in the synodic month average, something the Babylonians knew quite well
The length of the average synodic month, above, is the "
molad " period of the Jewish calendar
" Molad " is a Hebrew term meaning " pregnancy " or " birth " that is applied to Rosh Chodesh, ie, New Moon
New Moon is when the moon disappears hence the Sumerian Akkadian term bubbulu
" disappearance of the moon "
So, I don't find it strange
What I find strange is that people don't bother studying anymore, and because of that, they have come up with some incredibly bizarre ideas about things like worldwide floods