Audie
Veteran Member
But I see so many articles making that claim
To be serious C14 dating is used in some ice cores. But one can only do that in relatively shallow areas where the individual layers of annual deposition can be counted as well. Counting thousands upon thousands of layers is tedious and adds the chance of human error. C14 dating destroys part of the ice core. So they each have their drawbacks. The problem is that both can and have been used for those younger dates and the problems that the bogus article brought up do not seem to occur. I wonder why?
But for deeper layers other methods are used such as Argon/Argon, 238U to 234U and others. For anything more than 50,000 years old neither county not C14 are viable options. But by that time we are far beyond any flood date and the ice still does not float in the world of the creationist.
Preachin' to the choir, amen bro