If the site made any other statement, it would be in defiance of reason and evidence.Well, they can’t admit that, can they?
They can’t ignore the evidence (like they’d prefer), since greed has revealed the extent of Mammoth habitation in the far North! (And, no, not all are found in the Permafrost, as I have stated.)
No one is disputing that mammoths died or that bits and pieces of them were left behind to eventually freeze, but your claims are wild fantasy that bear no resemblance to the facts. Those tusks come from animals that died at different times. If a flood was responsible, there would be mammoth remnants world wide and there would be a mix of all sorts of other animals and plants as if stirred up in a stew pot and dumped everywhere.
You are hilarious. No one has ignored it, it just doesn't support a global flood and even if you could stretch it to fit your preconceived idea, that would not free you from the hundreds of other pieces of evidence that don't do not support the flood.Since science can’t ignore it now, they have to arrive at some natural explanation (which they conclude they don’t know)...they just can’t allow any supernatural explanation (I.e., the Bible’s account of the Flood) to have any credibility!
That would destroy the modern foundations of science!
There was no flood. We have nothing that says there was, except an allegory from the Bible, and even older ancient myths that were plagiarized to write the Bible story.So, they’ll just keep saying, “We don’t know how all the evidence correlates together.” (Which is the ‘accepted’ explanation.) And you’ll keep believing it. What sheep you and the others are.
Lol.