Eh. Like you would know.The Buddha didn't actually say that about Buddhist teaching, he was talking to non believers about their own beliefs.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Eh. Like you would know.The Buddha didn't actually say that about Buddhist teaching, he was talking to non believers about their own beliefs.
Basically the same cherry picking of scriptures that I see Therevada Buddhists doing!!
It would be strange to follow the parts you disagree with.Is it acceptable to cherry pick the religious scriptures and only follow the parts you agree with?
stopped making sense sometimes????
And if a Theravada Buddhist jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?Basically the same cherry picking of scriptures that I see Therevada Buddhists doing!!
Nope. If you're talking about the Bible then every verse has a context. People like to pick a verse out of context and build a belief around it, when in the context of the whole passage, and the broader context of Scripture that verse doesn't mean what they want it to mean. Many evils have been done by religious people who have excused their evil with a verse taken out of context.Is it acceptable to cherry pick the religious scriptures and only follow the parts you agree with?
And if a Theravada Buddhist jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?
There are some things in the Bible that are brutal, thou shall not permit a witch to live, a man that lies with a man shall be put to death, rules on how to treat your slaves, are they taken out of context to.Nope. If you're talking about the Bible then every verse has a context. People like to pick a verse out of context and build a belief around it, when in the context of the whole passage, and the broader context of Scripture that verse doesn't mean what they want it to mean. Many evils have been done by religious people who have excused their evil with a verse taken out of context.
I, for one, cherry pick the religious scriptures written in bold italic.Is it acceptable to cherry pick the religious scriptures and only follow the parts you agree with?
"one should accept the truth from whatever source it proceeds" - MaimonidesAnd this is why I like the Dalai Lama's saying that if science goes against a Buddhist scripture, go with science because the scriptures were written by those who knew far less than we now know.
Nope, not true. But you can believe that if it makes you feel better.Every Christian cherry picks the Scriptures
Scripture says people should be put to death for working on Sabbath or adultery. I don't know of any one who follows that. Sounds psychotic and cruel to me.Nope, not true. But you can believe that if it makes you feel better.
I love your posts JayhawkI, for one, cherry pick the religious scriptures written in bold italic.
When you're looking at the Bible It's really important to look at when each verse or verses you're talking about was said in the history of the Jews. If you're talking about Old Testament rules and regulations then you're seeing things that were said to a particular people for a particular time. God was trying to raise up a holy people who were surrounded by truly horrendous and brutal cultures. Those who worshiped Ba'al and Molech were way into human sacrifice. Those that weren't into human sacrifice worshiped through sex with temple prostitutes.There are some things in the Bible that are brutal, thou shall not permit a witch to live, a man that lies with a man shall be put to death, rules on how to treat your slaves, are they taken out of context to.
That was just for the Jews and only until Jesus came. Again, trying to create a holy people - not extended beyond the time that Jesus came and not to other believers than the Jews.Scripture says people should be put to death for working on Sabbath or adultery. I don't know of any one who follows that. Sounds psychotic and cruel to me.
The commandment against graven images was also for the Jews , not for Christians. There is nothing in the New Testament about it. Some Christians follow the OT rule on images, others don't. Either way, the people that do are cherry picking which OT verses applyWhen you're looking at the Bible It's really important to look at when each verse or verses you're talking about was said in the history of the Jews. If you're talking about Old Testament rules and regulations then you're seeing things that were said to a particular people for a particular time. God was trying to raise up a holy people who were surrounded by truly horrendous and brutal cultures. Those who worshiped Ba'al and Molech were way into human sacrifice. Those that weren't into human sacrifice worshiped through sex with temple prostitutes.
The Old Testament laws and regulations were to make the Jews a totally separate people - distinct and different from the cultures around them who were doing evil in God's eyes. These rules were meant for a certain people for a certain time. They were meant only until Jesus came who would help his people understand the heart behind them. For instance, through Moses God allowed a man to divorce his wife in a certain way, but Christ made it clear that this is not what was originally intended - they only were allowed to divorce because their hearts were so hard. Now divorce is only allowed because of infidelity. I know that Christians today have the same divorce rate as everybody else, but that's a conversation for another day.
Witchcraft was not allowed in the Old Testament again because God wanted his people to be holy and not to engage in the worship of demons, which is what was happening around them.
The Greek word for slave used in the New Testament doesn't speak of slaves taken by force against their will, but indentured servitude. People who would become somebody's servant for a set period of time so that they could have work and their family could have a place to stay. I know that people have used these verses to excuse the other kind of slavery, but that's a misreading of Scripture.
When you're looking at the Bible It's really important to look at when each verse or verses you're talking about was said in the history of the Jews. If you're talking about Old Testament rules and regulations then you're seeing things that were said to a particular people for a particular time. God was trying to raise up a holy people who were surrounded by truly horrendous and brutal cultures. Those who worshiped Ba'al and Molech were way into human sacrifice. Those that weren't into human sacrifice worshiped through sex with temple prostitutes.
The Old Testament laws and regulations were to make the Jews a totally separate people - distinct and different from the cultures around them who were doing evil in God's eyes. These rules were meant for a certain people for a certain time. They were meant only until Jesus came who would help his people understand the heart behind them. For instance, through Moses God allowed a man to divorce his wife in a certain way, but Christ made it clear that this is not what was originally intended - they only were allowed to divorce because their hearts were so hard. Now divorce is only allowed because of infidelity. I know that Christians today have the same divorce rate as everybody else, but that's a conversation for another day.
Witchcraft was not allowed in the Old Testament again because God wanted his people to be holy and not to engage in the worship of demons, which is what was happening around them.
The Greek word for slave used in the New Testament doesn't speak of slaves taken by force against their will, but indentured servitude. People who would become somebody's servant for a set period of time so that they could have work and their family could have a place to stay. I know that people have used these verses to excuse the other kind of slavery, but that's a misreading of Scripture.