Sleeppy
Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
Take my offer of asking God to settle this for us Elijah style or I'll take that as you being too afraid to put your money where your mouth is.
What are you looking to ask God?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Take my offer of asking God to settle this for us Elijah style or I'll take that as you being too afraid to put your money where your mouth is.
What are you looking to ask God?
To settle this matter for us with a blatant display of who is wrong, since all attempt at reasoned debate have proven fruitless.
Do you believe God will settle this, and not everything else? Or vice versa?
If we may provide a blatant sign to the entire Earth, we should. But, not even Christ has accomplished this (yet). Are we able to act on His behalf?
So I'm assuming you snipped out the verses that explicitly say that God will do anything a believer asks of Him if it's in His will?
Why would it not be God's will to resolve an issue that could help undermine false teachings and promote the Truth?
Why did God bother dealing with Jeremiah and the False Prophets?
What kind of blatant sign do you think the world would accept exactly?
Would you like to pray that those who unrepentantly speak falsehoods and refuse correction and refuse to hear what is true and push what is not true be silenced and made unable to do so and be humbled greatly?
The Law and the prophets necessitate it! So be it. I leap in anticipation for the coming Kingdom!!
The concept of 'EVEN until the thousandth generation" is obviously an idiom to mean "FOREVER".
And we're still on around generation 200-300 or so.
And Jesus says Heaven and Earth will collapse before the Law is void. (Another way of saying FOREVER).
Sorry if that pokes a hole in your argument in trying to say that God was a liar.
It's quite clear what these antinomians think about God's word, not to mention Jesus's.
Then the covenant should have been eternally void right after Rehoboam. Explain that one.
Moses has no power.
They would be followers of G-d
the Messiah still had not arrived in Rehoboam's day.
The covenant 'for a kingdom' was promised to the seed of Abraham....the Messiah is that seed.
yes, but they would do so through the words/teachings of Moses.
The directions given by moses were the way Isreal could enter into a relationship with God.
And likewise, the directions given by Jesus were the way the rest of mankind could enter into a relationship with God.
for all intents and purposes, the covenant 'for a kingdom' is everlasting. But that 'kingdom' is not the nation of Isreal!
The kingdom belongs to the Messiah...and to that faithful one, the covenant is most certainly everlasting. Those from mankind who make up the members of that kingdom are also everlasting.... but they are not from one particular nation such as Israel....they are individuals whom God chooses and some of them are people from the nations.
To them, the kingdom covenant is indefinitely lasting.
Then the covenant persisted with the Jerusalem Church and whoever followed after their manner.
But I have no reason to believe that only the Messiah was referred to as the Seed of Abraham.
Then the covenant persisted with the Jerusalem Church and whoever followed after their manner.
But I have no reason to believe that only the Messiah was referred to as the Seed of Abraham.
Jesus is the "King of the Jews".
Even by your own Paul, you gentiles are to be "Grafts" to the tree. The Tree doesn't change to the graft.
Jesus only came for the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel. His death included. All nations are to be made disciples out of. But what do you think Cornelius did before Paul entered the picture?
Apparently you missed the part where they were reconciled when they stopped worshiping idols.
Wow, the arguments of supercessionists resort to some very strange ideas, it's as if they haven't actually read the Hebrew scriptures or something.
The Jerusalem church were not practising Judaism ...they were christians.
The Jerusalem Church practiced the Law. End of story. I will not even tolerate or entertain any steaming claptrap that says otherwise, or tries to say that they were merely holding on to the Mosaic Law because they were too caught up in tradition.
And I really don't want have to explain again the difference between the Pharisee's "Manmade traditions" that constitutes what we would call "Judaism" in this sense versus a more "Reactionary" version of the Law.
not even when the text uses the 'singular' rather then plural?
The word "Seed" is constantly used in the singular to define an entire harvest of several members. This is just getting shameful. I feel like even responding to this steaming bull excrement is beneath me.
Strong's Hebrew: 2233. ?????? (zera) -- a sowing, seed, offspring
http://biblesuite.com/hebrew/zara_2233.htm