Just_me_Mike
Well-Known Member
Applaud the bible not me, I am just saying what the bible says.Brilliant. :clap
Again brilliant comment :clap
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Applaud the bible not me, I am just saying what the bible says.Brilliant. :clap
Romans 11Brilliant. :clap
I agree, trying to understand God is all but futile.I totally get what you are saying. It seems absurd for us to think of why God would do it this way. His ways are not our ways, and his purpose is for his pleasure.
Indeed, but I personally think that rather than trying to understand God's motives... we need to learn about our motives and how to address our actions for the betterment of humanity.By studying under this rationale I think we continue to learn more.
I agree... dogmatic adherence to single interpretations of tales like Genesis is totally counter to spiritual growth.If however we have built a wall, and can no longer go over that wall, there is nothing that will come out of the subject we study.
Oh my ...Romans 11 ... Epehsians 1 ... Philippians 2
No doubt.Seems pretty simple to me
:clap nice :clapI agree... dogmatic adherence to single interpretations of tales like Genesis is totally counter to spiritual growth.
Wow, what a jokester.Oh my ...
No doubt.
Again, this is a starting point to talk about this book. Painted wolf (I don't think) was implying I think my way of reading it is the only way. I never claimed that.:clap nice :clap
Very well, then, I offer this deal: suggest three scholarly commentaries on Parashat B’rei**** (your choice) and we'll walk through it verse by verse.How about offering something ...
Very well, then, I offer this deal: suggest three scholarly commentaries on Parashat B’rei**** (your choice) and we'll walk through it verse by verse.
I offer:Along with the following online resources ...
- Genesis: the JPS Torah Commentary by Sarna
- The Torah: A Modern Commentary by Plautt
- Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary by Alter
- Commentary on the Torah by Friedman
However, I fully expect you to address the text as opposed to shoveling Christology all over the Torah because you like to believe that it's there.
- NET Bible paticularly for its notes
- The Judaica Press Complete Tanach for the Rashi commentary
- The New English Translation of the Septuagint for completeness
- Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Onkelos for color
He wants to give you sources so you can see some of the wide range of thought on the nature of the scriptures.Unless I misunderstand your proposal, than I apologize.
I can understand that, but based of his or her remarks so far, I seriously doubt the motive behind presenting these was for my literary enjoyment. Unless I am wrong this is what I am being asked to debate.He wants to give you sources so you can see some of the wide range of thought on the nature of the scriptures.
Not all of them will likely be opinions he shares... but all will be of merit.
wa:do
This from the eisegete who gave us ...Wait a minute, am I to start copying and pasting other peoples views to have a discussion with you?
Romans 11
"33": O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
Epehsians 1
"9": Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:
Philippians 2
"13": For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.
I was asking you to discuss informed opinion. It was foolish of me.Unless I am wrong this is what I am being asked to debate.
No, it was for your education... Jay is a firm believer in "tough love".I can understand that, but based of his or her remarks so far, I seriously doubt the motive behind presenting these was for my literary enjoyment. Unless I am wrong this is what I am being asked to debate.
You're doing fine.ps. Sorry if I misstate your purpose or position on this Jay.
Seems to me, and correct me jay if I am mistaken, that Jay is trying to even the debate field by providing you some sources that he will be drawing from.I can understand that, but based of his or her remarks so far, I seriously doubt the motive behind presenting these was for my literary enjoyment. Unless I am wrong this is what I am being asked to debate.
Where do I begin? First let me say what I quoted was from the bible not a seperate book talking about the bible, and seeing this is a thread about the bible it only make sense to quote the bible.This from the eisegete who gave us ...What a joke ... :biglaugh:
No, it was for your education... Jay is a firm believer in "tough love".
If you are going to discuss different interpretations of Genesis, then you are going to need a broad base of knowledge to work from... including non-christian points of view.
wa:do
ps. Sorry if I misstate your purpose or position on this Jay.
Ah, mon cher, :kissbette most here would tell you that I am a very sensitive prick. (I'm particularly sensitive to vapid apologetics.)So, it is moronic to think I would have a problem debating on common ground, but that is not the attitude that was being presented by Jay. Instead it was one of an insensative prick.
Ah, mon cher, :kissbette most here would tell you that I am a very sensitive prick. (I'm particularly sensitive to vapid apologetics.)
Oh well, I retract my offer. But just to show you that I mean well, I'll leave you the reading list. After all, a little scholarship can't hurt ...