• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Four more impossibilities that disprove evolution, in addition to RNA only creatures and DNA/RNA with either asexual or sexual reproduction creatures.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
But there is a vast amount of evidence that supports the theory of evolution, otherwise why would so many (the majority of) scientists support such a theory, unless the few (relatively speaking), and religiously indoctrinated like yourself perhaps, who simply cannot accept what science promotes because it goes against that expressed in some particularly written text, even if this has no verifiable provenance. So who are the gamblers?
Vast amounts of evidence which refute evolution and billions of years.

Can you explain the 5 different aortic arches in animals, mapping that to some descent tree and explain it?
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Of course there is vast amounts of evidence that refutes evolution.
But if you ignore it like you just did then to you there is none,
The evidence you present is flawed, and you refuse to see the flaws.
I can point out the flaws, but I can't make you accept them.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Vast amounts of evidence which refute evolution and billions of years.

Can you explain the 5 different aortic arches in animals, mapping that to some descent tree and explain it?
Nope. Can you explain why you are so desperate to be believed, when most here are probably astonished at how gullible you seem to be?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
So why shouldn't we take all religious texts from the past literally as to their meanings? Do you do this with poetry? Why aren't you a Muslim - if you studied the Qur'an as much as your seemingly studying of the Bible - as per so many? Fitting the evidence to support a belief is simply the dumbest thing that any supposedly intelligent person can do.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
So why shouldn't we take all religious texts from the past literally as to their meanings? Do you do this with poetry? Why aren't you a Muslim - if you studied the Qur'an as much as your seemingly studying of the Bible - as per so many? Fitting the evidence to support a belief is simply the dumbest thing that any supposedly intelligent person can do.
Koran is easily proven false,
The Bible is easily proven true.
And evolution and billions of years are proven false,
 
Top