I agree. Violence should never be a part of a civilised society and people who kill others for blasphemy or apostasy should (ideally) be tried in a court of law and imprisoned. In my opinion.But it often does just that. Convert of die.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I agree. Violence should never be a part of a civilised society and people who kill others for blasphemy or apostasy should (ideally) be tried in a court of law and imprisoned. In my opinion.But it often does just that. Convert of die.
IMPO:'PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized what he calls “Islamic separatism” in his country and those who seek French citizenship without accepting the “right to commit blasphemy.”'
Read more here: Macron decries 'Islamic separatism,' defends blasphemy
IMPO:'PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized what he calls “Islamic separatism” in his country and those who seek French citizenship without accepting the “right to commit blasphemy.”'
Read more here: Macron decries 'Islamic separatism,' defends blasphemy
'PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized what he calls “Islamic separatism” in his country and those who seek French citizenship without accepting the “right to commit blasphemy.”'
Read more here: Macron decries 'Islamic separatism,' defends blasphemy
I think we need more blasphemy.
Interesting....If they want to live in a society that adheres to their ways then they should just have stayed in their homeland. If you cant accept the ways of your host then avoid being a rotten guest altogether and just don't come in the first place. Don't partake of our social amd legal benefits and protections and then scream about how bad they are.
Is he trying to win over the Le Pen vote? What's the real underlying reason for this?'PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized what he calls “Islamic separatism” in his country and those who seek French citizenship without accepting the “right to commit blasphemy.”'
Read more here: Macron decries 'Islamic separatism,' defends blasphemy
No!!! Disobeying an unjust law is a right, if not a duty. Civil Disobedience Quotes (67 quotes)Well. If in any country the law is such no one has any right to negate that law. So it is only right for any leader in that country to simply defend its law. Thats it.
No!!! Disobeying an unjust law is a right, if not a duty. Civil Disobedience Quotes (67 quotes)
Laws are made by people, and usually by a power elite with an interest in maintaining their power and privilege.
Laws differ in different jurisdictions, what's illegal in your town might be legal in the adjoining county. Laws are constantly changing. Laws are often unjust.
There is nothing sacrosanct about a law.
It's through challenging and disobeying laws that social change comes about.
The American slaves broke the law. Woman's suffrage demonstrators broke the law. Civil rights demonstrators broke the law. Anti-war protestors broke the law.
Jesus broke the law. Martin Luther broke the law. Harriet Tubman broke the law. Thoreau broke the law. Hans and Sophie Scholl broke the law. Gandhi broke the law. Martin Luther King broke the law.
Those labeled criminals today are oftened honored tomorrow.
I do not understand how arbitrary the limits of "civil disobedience" are.No!!! Disobeying an unjust law is a right, if not a duty. Civil Disobedience Quotes (67 quotes)
Laws are made by people, and usually by a power elite with an interest in maintaining their power and privilege.
Laws differ in different jurisdictions, what's illegal in your town might be legal in the adjoining county. Laws are constantly changing. Laws are often unjust.
There is nothing sacrosanct about a law.
It's through challenging and disobeying laws that social change comes about.
The American slaves broke the law. Woman's suffrage demonstrators broke the law. Civil rights demonstrators broke the law. Anti-war protestors broke the law.
Jesus broke the law. Martin Luther broke the law. Harriet Tubman broke the law. Thoreau broke the law. Hans and Sophie Scholl broke the law. Gandhi broke the law. Martin Luther King broke the law.
Those labeled criminals today are oftened honored tomorrow.
A theocrats reignIf theocrats reign
tis atheists' bane.
And Al Capone also broke the law. Is he honoured today?No!!! Disobeying an unjust law is a right, if not a duty. Civil Disobedience Quotes (67 quotes)
Laws are made by people, and usually by a power elite with an interest in maintaining their power and privilege.
Laws differ in different jurisdictions, what's illegal in your town might be legal in the adjoining county. Laws are constantly changing. Laws are often unjust.
There is nothing sacrosanct about a law.
It's through challenging and disobeying laws that social change comes about.
The American slaves broke the law. Woman's suffrage demonstrators broke the law. Civil rights demonstrators broke the law. Anti-war protestors broke the law.
Jesus broke the law. Martin Luther broke the law. Harriet Tubman broke the law. Thoreau broke the law. Hans and Sophie Scholl broke the law. Gandhi broke the law. Martin Luther King broke the law.
Those labeled criminals today are oftened honored tomorrow.
Conscience trumps law. I support breaking all unjust or harmful laws, everywhere.Alright. So you support breaking the law in France. Fine. Your prerogative.
And Al Capone also broke the law. Is he honoured today?
There is a difference between breaking the law and challenging a law. Challenging a law is much more than simply breaking it. It requires a public discussion, activism, engaging in politics - and the possibility to lose.
Everyone must make their own decisions. Just remember that you're individually responsible for your decisions. Hopefully you have some moral principles to guide you.I do not understand how arbitrary the limits of "civil disobedience" are.
Did he make his decisions based on idealistic moral principles?And Al Capone also broke the law. Is he honoured today?
There is a difference between breaking the law and challenging a law. Challenging a law is much more than simply breaking it. It requires a public discussion, activism, engaging in politics - and the possibility to lose.
Who decides which laws are unjust or harmful?Conscience trumps law. I support breaking all unjust or harmful laws, everywhere.
He trusts me...not you.Who decides which laws are unjust or harmful?
You?
@Revoltingest?
I would overturn RoevWade.
Is it my conscience that should Trump law?
Tom
Conscience trumps law. I support breaking all unjust or harmful laws, everywhere.
Who decides now? The effect of law or action is generally calculable. You can craft laws to benefit society or individuals, or you can base them on ancient laws which do not apply to modern society.Who decides which laws are unjust or harmful?
You?
@Revoltingest?
I would overturn RoevWade.
Is it my conscience that should Trump law?
Tom