I did not say Obama created ISIS .. silly strawman nonsense.
Correct, my mistake. Many others have said that Obama created it though.
But anyhow, it is not true either.
You accused another poster of loving tyrants and dictators .. as if this has some relevance to Tulsi Gabbard. .. Ad hom fallacy on steroids
No, first it wasn't me who said that. I merely agreed with it since it is supported by lots of evidence.
Secondly, the statement had not much to do with Gabbard either, so it wasn't an ad hom.
You might want to look up what an ad hom is also.
Second you claim "Pro Ukraine" .. and you are a Biden supporter
Who said I'm a Biden supportor?
.. Ukraine is run by a dictator
No, Ukraine is run by a democratically elected president.
.. Genocide Joe is tyrant .. war criminal - Holocaust supporter . and so on
Talk about ad homs
And none of this is even true.
and last .. that someone does not support spending treasure on Ukraine .. ..does not make one a Putin Supporter
Depends on the reason for not sending help, off course.
It just so happens that those who are against it, also seem to be the ones who like to be friends with Mr Putin and / or who look up to him.
but all that aside .. the primary point here is your Ad Hom fallacy
There wasn't any ad hom.
... and ridiculous nonsense about Tulsi being a Russian Hero
Nobody said she was a Russian hero. Your reading comprehension needs serious work.
Now that we have dispensed with the idea that name calling is an argument for something .. or crying out "Tulsi is a hero to Russia" - not a USA Patriot .. givine no substantiation for unsupported claim
Gabbard shared conspiracy nonsense on social media which came straight from Russian propaganda channels. She cozied up with Assad also.
Head of intelligence who can't even differentiate sheer propaganda from actual intelligence. "good choice".
Tulsi is a hero to the people .. wanted the tyrant and war criminal Biden to stop arming the 911 terrorist Group Al Qaeda -- and spawn .. the "Islamic State"
Regardless of what other things she did. As said above, if you think it's a good idea to put a person in charge as head of intelligence who can't even see the difference between actual intelligence and sheer propaganda from dictators - go right ahead. It will not end well though.