In my opinion...you have a Middle Eastern background.
Something like Persian or Azeri...
right?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
- Thread starter Estro Felino
- Start date
Something like Persian or Azeri...
right?
Once again, so very very wrong.In my opinion...you have a Middle Eastern background.
Something like Persian or Azeri...
right?
So you have a European background?
Keep guessing.
It's fun to watch.
Well...
Willy is Scottish. Your ancestors must be from Glasgow.
I have only a smidgeon of Scottish blood.
From where in that country, I don't know.
lol
what is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
This is the second time I had to point out to you that that particular comment wasn't about Tulsi.
I said no such thing. Quote me.
I never even mentioned Gaza.
What Israel does is in violation of international law actually. And idd, the USA notoriously have always vetoed any and all resolutions against Israel's warcrimes.
You are all over the place. Even mixing things up. It's almost like you are reading what you want to read instead of what is actually written. Almost.
Try some decent spelling and grammar before trying to claim the intellectual high-ground.
The typo Nazi .. as an argument for something - is not the intellectual high ground friend but, to the contrary .. is admission of failure
heh heh heh.. "grammar .. in an internet chat room .. thats it .. .pointing out grammar errors will win the debate" .. and you seriously think this is not a huge logical fail ? Now what was asserted without evidence on my part ? .. I am not the one who was making unsupported accusations about Tulsi .. not the one who needs to come up with some support for claim .. another logic fail
What was your comment about if not Tulsi " a lover of dictators and tyrants" as a poster saying that about her was the topic of conversation .. and you said there was lots of evidence ..for this thing .. but provided none. .. and accuse me of being all over the place in some kind of projective haze ?!
... good grief ... must be an Auzzi .. a smidgeon of Scottish and a double dose of Convict !
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
The typo Nazi .. as an argument for something - is not the intellectual high ground friend but, to the contrary .. is admission of failure
Good job picking the one statement while ignoring the rest of the post.
I pointed it out already, why ask again?
We have already pointed out multiple times that that statement wasn't about Tulsi. Your reading comprehension seems seriously lacking.
If you can't even follow a simple thought concerning who the subject matter of a statement is, then there's no point in continuing with it.
I'm done with you.
Either you are really having serious attention issues, or you are arguing dishonestly in extremely bad faith.
Either way, there's no point in continuing the conversation. Nothing will come out of this.
Another blistering pile of personal invective .. rather than responding to the topic which is Tulsi. What statement are you talking about .. what post number ? and why do you laughably not disclose who this mystery statement is about. .. What a funny joke
LOL
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
What statement are you talking about .. what post number ? and why do you laughably not disclose who this mystery statement is about. .. What a funny joke
The joke's on you and your lack of reading comprehension.
Here's the trail of posts in chronological order and in which you yourself were involved. It took me the full 20 seconds to find them
It concerns a statement made by @F1fan about @Estro Felino , to which you then replied and misunderstood. I corrected it and you simply doubled down.
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
She definitely deserves that. A patriot and a woman who cares about the US soldiers who are precious and valuable... and whose lives cannot be wasted in idiotic wars artificially created by the MIC.
www.religiousforums.com
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
And yet, I'm not seeing you speak out against Russia like you speak out against Ukraine. What's that about? Well, maybe you're just not paying attention, or you're only seeing what you want to see. Maybe if you didn't selectively quote and included posts in their entirety, you would have...
www.religiousforums.com
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
And yet, I'm not seeing you speak out against Russia like you speak out against Ukraine. What's that about? Well, maybe you're just not paying attention, or you're only seeing what you want to see. Maybe if you didn't selectively quote and included posts in their entirety, you would have...
www.religiousforums.com
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
And yet, I'm not seeing you speak out against Russia like you speak out against Ukraine. What's that about? Well, maybe you're just not paying attention, or you're only seeing what you want to see. Maybe if you didn't selectively quote and included posts in their entirety, you would have...
www.religiousforums.com
Note how it starts and how you ended it.
Note also how I responded to that last post where I already pointed out your mistake.
Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence
And yet, I'm not seeing you speak out against Russia like you speak out against Ukraine. What's that about? Well, maybe you're just not paying attention, or you're only seeing what you want to see. Maybe if you didn't selectively quote and included posts in their entirety, you would have...
www.religiousforums.com
And even after that, you simply continued to double down on the same mistake.
This is just one example of how I concluded that either you indeed have reading comprehension issues at best, or argue in bad faith at worst.
Either way, discussion is futile.
I don't care about your previous discussion with this poster .. and I was not even responding to you .. but the poster about the false claim that Tulsi is a lover of Dictators and Tyrants ..
What part of .. I was respoding to the poster about the Tulsi comment .. do you not understand. You then chimed in supporting the claim of the poster .. but later claim you were not talking about Tulsi .. .. which is ridiculous nonsense but fine. Good that you take back your nasty false claims about Tulsi - Hero to the people.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Are you just trolling or....?
There was no Tulsi comment.
No. I chimed in to bring to your attention that the claim wasn't about Tulsi.
There is no claim to take back.
I spelled it out for you word for word, post for post, and still you double down on your mistake.
Bad faith, it is.
This is so hilarious....
Bye bye now.
Are you just trolling or....?
There was no Tulsi comment.
No. I chimed in to bring to your attention that the claim wasn't about Tulsi.
There is no claim to take back.
I spelled it out for you word for word, post for post, and still you double down on your mistake.
Bad faith, it is.
This is so hilarious....
Bye bye now.
It was not your Tulsi Coment but that of another poster .. not sure why this is so difficult to understand .. and if you did not make a Tulsi comment .. Wonderful .. glad you agree that she is not a lover of dictators and tyrant. now go and be Happy.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
For crying out loud...
That other poster was @F1fan and he was talking about @Estro Felino , not about Tulsi, as I have pointed out to you 5 or 6 times now.
uhu
I agreed to no such thing since I didn't even talk about it.
All I did was try, in vain it seems, to correct your mistakes and misunderstandings.
But you seem to be insisting on being wrong.
She is sympathic to putin, and she is a security risk. Many in congress and intelligence don't trust her. If Trump is being serious in selecting her his judgment is worse than we thought. Trump might as well select the Russian ambassador.
Not sure if you are aware friend .. but the topic is Tulsi Gabbard -- if you don't want to talk about her opposition to Tyrant Biden's support for terrorists and commission crimes against humanity .. this is fine but then you should find another thread to post in .. and stop distracting others from the topic .. wandering down rabbit holes .. that sort of thing..
BUT -- if you do want to talk about the Topic -- then tell us why you do not agree with Tulsi calling out Bama-Lama for arming - supporting and supplying the 911 Terrorist group Al Qaeda --- and spawn .. with sophisticated US military technology ?
Last edited:
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
So? You think that validates misrepresenting statements by posters?
I did not misrepresent F1 - you jumped into a conversation .. unaware of what the conversation was about .. and are complaining to me about some off topic comment by another poster .. that this rabbit hole adventure was misrepresented .. Let it go Brother M .. and consider addressing the topic at hand .. which is Tulsi .. and her heroic stance against the authoritarian Blue Tyrany .. war mongering insanity .. and hatred for the founding principle and the constitutional republic.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
I quoted it word for word, post for post and showed you how you in fact misunderstood @F1fan 's statement.
"misunderstood" then turned into "misrepresented" when you continued to double and triple down on it, after it was brought to your attention several times already.
I read the entire conversation. I am well aware what it was about.
I'm not your "brother".
She is a person unfit for the job as she can't even tell the difference between actual intelligence and sheer propaganda, as noted by her sharing wacky conspiracy fakenews straight from the Russian propaganda mill. And she did the same with Assad nonsense.