Gabbard nominated as Director of National Intelligence

[F1fan]

She is a person unfit for the job as she can't even tell the difference between actual intelligence and sheer propaganda, as noted by her sharing wacky conspiracy fakenews straight from the Russian propaganda mill. And she did the same with Assad nonsense.

I know very little about Gabbard, except that she was a democrat who became a right wing darling. I don't use right wing media so have never seen anyhting she's said. I have seen some clips of her saying some rather alarming things. I would not feel comfortable with her in any position of national security. I think Trump is irresponsible even considering her. It illustrates how poorly MAGA voters reason and consider the presidency.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I know very little about Gabbard, except that she was a democrat who became a right wing darling. I don't use right wing media so have never seen anyhting she's said. I have seen some clips of her saying some rather alarming things. I would not feel comfortable with her in any position of national security. I think Trump is irresponsible even considering her. It illustrates how poorly MAGA voters reason and consider the presidency.

She shared a post on social media straight from the Russian propaganda mill, saying the Russian invasion was "necessary" because Ukraine was going to develop biological weapons with the help of the US to attack Russia.

She also went to Syria to have a friendly meeting with Assad after she rejected the evidence that he used chemical weapons.

And this is the person that will become the head of intelligence. *slow clap*

 

[Estro Felino]

She shared a post on social media straight from the Russian propaganda mill, saying the Russian invasion was "necessary" because Ukraine was going to develop biological weapons with the help of the US to attack Russia.

I mean...even cats here know that that elitist cabal of demons are paying Kiev to wage a war against Russia.
And the Donbas War was just a pretext.

She also went to Syria to have a friendly meeting with Assad after she rejected the evidence that he used chemical weapons.

Again, there is no evidence.
Assad is a gentleman who assured decades of stability in his multicultural country.

And this is the person that will become the head of intelligence. *slow clap*

Yes.
The cabal of warmongers started it.

If the Democratic Party had been a normal party, she would have remained.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I mean...even cats here know that that elitist cabal of demons are paying Kiev to wage a war against Russia.
And the Donbas War was just a pretext.

Again, there is no evidence.
Assad is a gentleman who assured decades of stability in his multicultural country.

Yes.
The cabal of warmongers started it.

If the Democratic Party had been a normal party, she would have remained.

 

[Sargonski]

I'm not your "brother".

She is a person unfit for the job as she can't even tell the difference between actual intelligence and sheer propaganda, as noted by her sharing wacky conspiracy fakenews straight from the Russian propaganda mill. And she did the same with Assad nonsense.

Your claims about Tulsi are complete falsehood - name calling with no support is as lame as it get .. and you have not the faintest idea about the war in Syria .. nor about propaganda .. obiously not even knowing the definition of the word "Russian Propaganda Mill"

What propaganada was that Tulsi bought into .. and an example for Assad as well ..

I look forward to hearing support for these naked claims and name calling .. Brother from another mother perhaps .. and why do you not share in the brotherly love ?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Your claims about Tulsi are complete falsehood

No, they aren't. It's public information.

What propaganada was that Tulsi bought into .. and an example for Assad as well ..

I already told you.

 

[Sargonski]

No, they aren't. It's public information.

what public information is that .. and which false claim of yours is supported by this public information . If you have support for a claim then by all means present it .. thus far all you have presented is naked claims which is not an argument.

Do you know that an argument consists of two things Brother T ? 1) claim or premise and 2) <?>
Now what do you think <2> might be .. without witch .. you have no argument. and are comitting an "Assumed Premise Fallacy" .. Lets call it APF .. since this can lable 99.7 % of your posts. .. and so from now on ... when you engage in this fallacy .. I will will mark with APF .. and you will know what that means right !

So your work is before you .. tell us what else is required for an argument . and what the word "Fallacy" means. feel free to use google.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

what public information is that .. and which false claim of yours is supported by this public information . If you have support for a claim then by all means present it .. thus far all you have presented is naked claims which is not an argument.

Do you know that an argument consists of two things Brother T ? 1) claim or premise and 2) <?>
Now what do you think <2> might be .. without witch .. you have no argument. and are comitting an "Assumed Premise Fallacy" .. Lets call it APF .. since this can lable 99.7 % of your posts. .. and so from now on ... when you engage in this fallacy .. I will will mark with APF .. and you will know what that means right !

So your work is before you .. tell us what else is required for an argument . and what the word "Fallacy" means. feel free to use google.

I already informed you of all these things.
It's public information. Stop trolling