• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gay

Marisa

Well-Known Member
Reframe God and you'll reframe life. Keep sniffing for BS an you'll keep finding BS. Sniff out truth and you'll find exactly that.
I'm not "reframing" anything. I'm just doing what you won't, holding your god accountable to his own standard of morality. And the truth of that matter is that this god does not measure up to his own ruler. ;)
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
Or it could just indicate that I have no interest in continuing in a conversation with you :eek: I don't remember being obligated to respond to anyone for that matter when I signed up for this :/ I know what I know and you think what you think, beyond that, I'm not interested.
Funnily enough, indicating no interest would look more like not responding at all. :eek:
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
But that wouldn't be getting my point across ;) if you can't take a hint and run with it, then that's your problem.
Never mind the fact that you don't possess enough self control to give the ultimate hint, which is to not respond. Like, at all.




Right.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
Yeah but it's pretty illogical to claim somebody is "unworthy" of their time when conversation was initiated by that person. Don't start a fire if you're not know how to keep yourself from being burnt.
But then she wound't have gotten her point across.


Damn, I love this logic thing!
 
Yes it would; far more effectively, in fact.



Communication is a two-way process. You thought you were communicating one thing, but what you thought you were communicating is a context that I've never once encountered before, and thus had no reason to detect. On the other hand, I've seen the context that I spoke of many, many times, and thus that was what you ultimately communicated to me, whether you intended to or not.

Well it's a good thing you detected it this time! Now you know for future reference :)
 
I'm not "reframing" anything. I'm just doing what you won't, holding your god accountable to his own standard of morality. And the truth of that matter is that this god does not measure up to his own ruler. ;)

There's a difference between free will and Gods will. God can do as he pleases and it won't be for an unjust cause since he his Justice. You just keep on looking for the negative then since none of this will mean anything to you.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Yeah but it's pretty illogical to claim somebody is "unworthy" of their time when conversation was initiated by that person. Don't start a fire if you're not know how to keep yourself from being burnt.
What do expect when you laugh at other people's religious beliefs?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
There's a difference between free will and Gods will. God can do as he pleases and it won't be for an unjust cause since he his Justice. You just keep on looking for the negative then since none of this will mean anything to you.
Slavery and genocide are never just. If he tells people "thou shalt not kill," he should practice what he preaches.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
There's a difference between free will and Gods will. God can do as he pleases and it won't be for an unjust cause since he his Justice. You just keep on looking for the negative then since none of this will mean anything to you.
On the contrary, it means a great deal to me. If god is justice then I expect that I should have no problem in seeing that all of his actions are just. Tell me, was it "just" to kill all the children of Egypt, after removing Pharoah's free will? Is it "just" to punish me for the manufactured transgression of Adam and Eve? And while we're on the subject of Adam and Eve, was it just to punish them for committing a crime they couldn't possibly have known they were committing since they hadn't yet eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?

I would say don't bother answering because you'll just have some crappy apologetic, but I know you've got a point to make and don't possess the self control to let silence speak for you.
 
Never mind the fact that you don't possess enough self control to give the ultimate hint, which is to not respond. Like, at all.




Right.

What I'm not comprehending is how people are so wrapped into this forum thing to the point that unsaid rules and regulations have to be set. I'm not here to learn how to talk to people, I'm a Host, I talk to plenty a day and from my experience, being very blunt is much more professional or acceptable than not responding to a person at all out in the real world. I don't know what your guys social skills are like, but they seem very distasteful.
And this isn't in a sarcastic nor demeaning tone, just an honest statement.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
:eek: I guess that's just an opinion that's not mine :eek:
Do you generally frantically mash the refresh button over things you aren't interested in? I don't. Which is why I keep mashing it looking for updates in this thread. Don't play stupid, unless you want me to think you're stupid.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
What I'm not comprehending is how people are so wrapped into this forum thing to the point that unsaid rules and regulations have to be set. I'm not here to learn how to talk to people, I'm a Host, I talk to plenty a day and from my experience, being very blunt is much more professional or acceptable than not responding to a person at all out in the real world. I don't know what your guys social skills are like, but they seem very distasteful.
And this isn't in a sarcastic nor demeaning tone, just an honest statement.
Well, we have enough social skills to know not to laugh at other people's beliefs for things that can be said of our own. My advice to you if you don't want debate on these issues is to go troll through the DIR's. I can guarantee you won't find me in any of them.
 
On the contrary, it means a great deal to me. If god is justice then I expect that I should have no problem in seeing that all of his actions are just. Tell me, was it "just" to kill all the children of Egypt, after removing Pharoah's free will? Is it "just" to punish me for the manufactured transgression of Adam and Eve? And while we're on the subject of Adam and Eve, was it just to punish them for committing a crime they couldn't possibly have known they were committing since they hadn't yet eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?

I would say don't bother answering because you'll just have some crappy apologetic, but I know you've got a point to make and don't possess the self control to let silence speak for you.

Adam and Eve were told not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge. Point blank. They did not listen. They were punished for disobeying a command.

Children go to Heaven, and so do children of God(adults). Those who didn't follow the law that was put in the past paid for it. I don't have the details of each and every persons life written on my hand, but if God did it, it was just. Death isn't a bad thing unless the dead one doesn't have God. Then it sucks.

And silence isn't going to explain who God is or argue on God's part, I can though.
 
Top