• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Genetic 'Adam & Eve' Chromosome Study Traces All Men To Man Who Lived 135,000 Years Ago

Domenic

Active Member
Wow are you living in the dark ages.

"Do you know how fossils are made?"

Yes

"How do you know the earth is 4 billon years old...there is not way to test such an age."

Yes there is and not only that we know how our solar system formed and others in the universe. We also know the sun is 5 billion years old and we go red giant in about another 5 billion years. The Earth is 4.57 billion years old. Also the moon formed by a collionsion with the early Earth by a planet the size of Mars. You might also have seen all those craters on the moon.

There are things living right now older then 6000 years. WE also know the age of the universe by 1% at 13.82 billion years. We have pictures of it frozen in light.

"Can you explain how animals are found frozen in ice with tropical food in their mouth?"
Yes

"Can you explain how whales, and trees have been found on end going threw layers of earth?"
Yes

"The universities you claim are credible also teach evolution"

Yes because its a fact.

"there has to be millions of bones from every stage of evolution, but they have never found any bones from even one stage?"

This is a huge misunderstanding on your part and yes we have billions of fossils as well as another preservation method, Amber.

"Modern education seems to more theory than fact."

Someone should really explain this to you.

"
Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact?
It is both. But that answer requires looking more deeply at the meanings of the words "theory" and "fact."


fossil.jpg


In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence.

The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.

Evolution Resources from the National Academies


"Science has proven there was a world flood, and yes, science dates it to around 4,000 years ago.

This is an outright lie.

"where are all these bone."

The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program

Evidence of Evolution
Scientists have discovered a wealth of evidence concerning human evolution, and this evidence comes in many forms. Thousands of human fossils enable researchers and students to study the changes that occurred in brain and body size, locomotion, diet, and other aspects regarding the way of life of early human species over the past 6 million years. Millions of stone tools, figurines and paintings, footprints, and other traces ofhuman behavior in the prehistoric record tell about where and how early humans lived and when certain technological innovations were invented. Study of human genetics show how closely related we are to other primates – in fact, how connected we are with all other organisms – and can indicate the prehistoric migrations of our species, Homo sapiens, all over the world. Advances in the dating of fossils and artifacts help determine the age of those remains, which contributes to the big picture of when different milestones in becoming human evolved.



Exciting scientific discoveries continually add to the broader and deeper public knowledge of human evolution. Find out about the latest evidence in our What’s Hot in Human Originssection.





Behavior

Explore the evidence of early human behavior—from ancient footprints to stone tools and the earliest symbols and art – along with similarities and differences in the behavior of other primate species.


3D Collection

Explore our 3D collection of fossils, artifacts, primates, and other animals.


Human Fossils

From skeletons to teeth, early human fossils have been found of more than 6,000 individuals. Look into our digital 3-D collection and learn about fossil human species.


Genetics

Our genes offer evidence of how closely we are related to one another – and of our species’ connection with all other organisms.


Dating

The layers that contain fossils and archeological clues can be dated by more than a dozen techniques that use the basic principles of physics, chemistry, and Earth sciences. Some techniques can even estimate the age of the ancient teeth and bones directly. Advances in dating have made human evolution very exciting!



Human Evolution by The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program


LOL...it is you who are the dark ages my friend. All the above has been proven false.
 

shawn001

Well-Known Member
LOL...it is you who are the dark ages my friend. All the above has been proven false.

We already know by what you posted you have no clue about any of the sciences.

By who? All of the above? Really? Show me they have been proven false and my bet is you won't and can't.
 

shawn001

Well-Known Member
It's not worth the Time.

I was going to post that for you, because I already knew you wouldn't do it and can't. You had the time to post all the misinformation and one an outright lie, but no the time to fix or support your claims except its all false, common tactic of the misinformed.
 

Midnight Rain

Well-Known Member
No I don't, but others seem to:

Dating Methods - SixDays.org
sixdays.org/Dating-MethodsCached
... then radiometric dating does not work. ... It does not work on sedimentary layers because ... The uniformitarian worldview does not account for the worldwide flood.
A worldwide flood wouldn't actually change the radiometric dates of items. Its one of the reasons why we can date items from under the sea. Also there is no evidence of a worldwide flood and is physically impossible with the current amount of water we have on Earth.

Crazy thing is tho...even if there was a worldwide flood we can still use sedimentary layers as we do use sedentary layers that were once under the ocean. Most of our whale fossils come from these for example.
 

Domenic

Active Member
A worldwide flood wouldn't actually change the radiometric dates of items. Its one of the reasons why we can date items from under the sea. Also there is no evidence of a worldwide flood and is physically impossible with the current amount of water we have on Earth.

Crazy thing is tho...even if there was a worldwide flood we can still use sedimentary layers as we do use sedentary layers that were once under the ocean. Most of our whale fossils come from these for example.

How do you explain trees, standing upright through many sedimentary layers, and whales standing on their tails through 10-20 sedimentary layers?
 

Parsimony

Well-Known Member
No I don't, but others seem to:

Dating Methods - SixDays.org
sixdays.org/Dating-MethodsCached
... then radiometric dating does not work. ... It does not work on sedimentary layers because ... The uniformitarian worldview does not account for the worldwide flood.
As stated already, radioactive decay rates would not be changed by a flood. If radiometric dating was faulty, then different dating methods on the same sample would yield inconsistent results and those would be inconsistent with non-radiometric dating methods (such as ice core dating and varve dating). If this was true, then such dating methods would have been recognized as untrustworthy and would have been abandoned a long time ago. In reality, these methods do tend to be consistent with each other (when the methods are used properly).
How do you explain trees, standing upright through many sedimentary layers, and whales standing on their tails through 10-20 sedimentary layers?
Quite easily, actually: "Polystrate" Fossils
 
Last edited:

Domenic

Active Member
So you don't have any sources?

Yes I have many sources. If I were to look in my notes for all the stuff some of you are to lazy to research I'd have no time to do anything else. If you really want to know do a search.
 

Midnight Rain

Well-Known Member
How do you explain trees, standing upright through many sedimentary layers, and whales standing on their tails through 10-20 sedimentary layers?
The tree's because sedimentary layers build up over and around them. Its called juting. And whales do not typically form top to bottom in fossils. In fact nearly ever single one I have ever heard of was in a single layer. There was one exception but this was explained because of recent volcanic activity that actually shifted the sedimentary layers that were already in existence to an angle. How can you explain that every single fossil of any given time period is always found in EXACTLY the correct spot? A flood wouldn't cause this phenomenon.
 

Domenic

Active Member
The tree's because sedimentary layers build up over and around them. Its called juting. And whales do not typically form top to bottom in fossils. In fact nearly ever single one I have ever heard of was in a single layer. There was one exception but this was explained because of recent volcanic activity that actually shifted the sedimentary layers that were already in existence to an angle. How can you explain that every single fossil of any given time period is always found in EXACTLY the correct spot? A flood wouldn't cause this phenomenon.

Polystrate fossils are found extending through multiple layers of sediment. Many trees have been found fossilized in a vertical position through layers of coal, sandstone, and other sediments. Certainly, the trees would have decayed if millions of years had occurred between the different strata.


Polystrate fossils such as this one are found all over the world. They run through many rock layers proving the rock layers are not different ages as the textbooks teach.


As to the 80 foot whale standing on its tail through many layers...I won't say I believe it. All the trees they have found like that in the picture do not have roots. There are many like this around the world.
Geologists fail to accept that the only reasonable explanation of polystrate fossils is that the layers formed quickly around plant and animal life before they had time to decay. Seems to correspond with the biblical account of the worldwide Flood, doesn’t it?
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
If the earth is 135,000 years old, where did all the bones go?
Only some bones get buried. Most animals that die will leave their bones open, on top of soil, accessible for other animals to eat and gnaw on. Shame on them for not hiding them better! :D Anyway, in some cases, an animal dies in a swamp, lake with lose soil at the bottom, or in lava, etc. And other animals won't get to them. That's why a majority of bones never make it to become fossilized.
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
How do you explain trees, standing upright through many sedimentary layers,
There are some cases where you have polystrate fossils. You can find the explanation to how this is happening if you search for it. It's not as strange as you might think.

Have you ever put a spoon in your ice cream? How did it get there if it wasn't created in the ice cream by the ice cream maker? Strange, isn't it.

and whales standing on their tails through 10-20 sedimentary layers?
Whales?

You mean this story?
Had anybody taken the time and trouble to check the facts, they would have found that the story by Russel (1976) took some liberty with the facts and lacked very important information. First, the skeleton was not found in a vertical position, but was lying at an angle 50 to 40 degrees from horizontal. Finally, although at this angle, the whale skeleton lay parallel to the bedding of strata which at one time was the sea floor on which the dead whale fell after its death. These facts were confirmed by inquiring with the people at the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History who excavated the whale. Although nothing had been published on the whale, Russel (1976) clearly identified the staff who excavated the skeleton and they could have been easily called at the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History in Los Angeles, California.
A Whale of a Tale
 
Top