This is a very creepy thread and it's disturbing that people found your post funny.
Anyway, no. You can't tell by looking at someone and hymens are totally useless in determining sexual activity. This is just misogyny.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Girl versus woman
- Thread starter InvestigateTruth
- Start date
Anyway, no. You can't tell by looking at someone and hymens are totally useless in determining sexual activity. This is just misogyny.
Probably not visually. Maybe, but I don't think it would be consistent enough to establish as a viable way. I could tell by talking to them. Not by asking them directly if they are married/sexually active, mind you. But just by their response to other questions. Virgins do tend to have different mentality than a sexually active person. I am not saying it's a good or bad thing, it just is.
For all I know both women are virgins. Just because a woman has been married for 30 years doesn't mean she sexually active. It's rare, but yes this can happen.
seems like a very creepy topic.
InvestigateTruth
Veteran Member
Why creepy?!!
InvestigateTruth
Veteran Member
How about, the effect of absorption of man semen in woman? Scientifically it does have some effects, even on genes I remember reading. Maybe you want to look it up, and let me know what you found?
I'm not looking any of that up. This whole topic is gross to me. Try actually reading the posts you reply to. I think this thread is creepy and perverted.
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
There are far more of them than one might think.
InvestigateTruth
Veteran Member
Good question. Maybe not, maybe yes. Haven't tried it. But as i posted above, I think, the Man semen which is absorbed in woman have a real effect on their physical appearance. I search on google, and found some results with what I thought, but have not investigated it throughly, so, I thought to know other people's opinion on it.
I don't think "creepy" is the word I would use, but you have to admit, it is kind of a weird question. If it's a matter of idle curiosity for no particular reason, that may be one thing. But the idea of someone examining women to see if they can tell if they're virgins or not - that's what seems a bit off. Why does it even matter?
Is it some kind of contest of "Guess the Virgin"?
This is an interesting read and it is in New Scientist, so not exactly pseudoscience,
Semen has controlling power over female genes and behaviour
Semen has controlling power over female genes and behaviour
Because of what it implies, like you have a fixation on it when it's irrelevant. Why do you care if a woman is a virgin or not? Virginity is a made up concept itself.
Yes, this is the concerning part.
A true OT ritual ratified by god . Numbers 31:17-18
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
You can't, and why would you need to? What a silly question.
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Yeah, the title seems to imply that womanhood depends upon receiving peen rather than upon development and maturity. A rather ***-backwards way of looking at things.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Because such details are both private and irrelevant.