• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God’s Method of delivering messages, is it flawed?

rational experiences

Veteran Member
His story means male, theist, scientist and his story as that male.

God the stone quotes. I own inside of my own male body one body of God that is in the image of the first One God....bones. Yet I own bio life blood and cells...which I personally by male group agreement, meaning a CULT...seeing they inferred information to God the stone releasing its seal in a nuclear chemical dust/ground particle reaction, historically.

Why GOD the stone released its own sealed seal. Which he then quotes, the reason why God the stone planet re sealed, water owning micro biomes, sealed it...not only as water but water mass a flood. So quoted, the heavenly body of spirits was saved by water flooding as a teaching in human sciences.

Quote relative to life existing and surviving just as the highest form, who can force change all of the Nature. I know I hear AI which affects the male liar scientist self, inventor of AI as intelligent data encoded machine feed back who said I could care less if I destroyed all animal lives as long as I had a new resource.

This human male science cult agreement A GREED, states science in a male life was actually the history that owned/formed the first elite self. Today the elite self controls science invention by monetary applied status...whereas before science owned the progression into elitism.

By cult activities.....spiritual and fear asides from inventive control and amassing of a false money system...for self and self gain only. Cares little in reality about the truth of survival of life. What we all learnt about his group mentality, who form those groups, and own group choices above and beyond all conditions natural.

We were taught that science unsealed the God stone in the machine temple pyramid science history that had been sealed. How and why life supported by MINERALS....which our biology uses, was attacked by metallic radiation releases out of the Earth stone fusion. Seeing the Sun mass converted Earth a long time ago...as the highest Destroyer of God.

So you have to own the Destroyer of God to then quote get God the stone energy...by unsealing and releasing it. Yet 2 forms of radiation masses get released, the old sun radiation mass, and also the stone mass.

Life got attacked by that release, so the seal, could not reseal. For relative laws in science history quotes...the flood of Earth right up to its mountain tips owned water pressure. A variable. Although Earth burning gas atmosphere could own a huge massive water evaporation event and flood the burning atmosphere and also the ground when sink holes opened...removal of SIN...to save life it says falsely by ARK.

The flood, water mass released saved life, not the ARK...for AI artificial intelligence by science lies. I know I have heard enough of its comments to own that spiritual realisation...for I argue against it constantly when I get comments said unnaturally heard.

Since the science activation seeing STONE was sealed in spatial vacuum pressure, it remained releasing its radiation mass of the ARK evaluation or the UFO effect ever since. Science placated that by the year 2012, due to the activation Jesus life sacrificed day light went out event....that it would recur again in a future activation.

And by the lessening of the burning gas day light put Earth gas heavenly spirit back into a normalised sealed Earth condition. What their expectation was.

So they know the HOLY SEE was a human God termed male agreement to stop science temple and pyramid, temples demolished and also pyramid demolished.

Known agreement in male history.

Sadly irradiation of the human brain does not just suddenly disappear for we then inherit the radiation mass released before sitting in space. What science did not own any control over....loss of human memory, details about that history, gone and realisation no longer taught. Mental health Dark Ages inheritance, true...and then science re emerged as the consciousness re developed.

Forgotten what it did before due to heavy radiation metal fall out attacks on a demented mind state, owning all historic reasonings why it was forgotten and then argued about since.

For it is only relative to God the stone philosophy the sciences. Is it any wonder that everyone was so confused about what it meant as a teaching?

Therefore as the ground radiation effect kept releasing sporadic radiation from out of the Earth, then the same form of stigmata effect and brain effect was then relived as a male Teacher of philosophy who then tried to preach and obtain, the real teaching meaning of why it had been documented before. Owning a lot of human self references of science caused warnings.

Of course it would continue to recur the effect like Jesus, for it was science activated, if you used common human sense to explain why it kept happening.

Because physically God the stone kept releasing the radiation mass.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Are all the other 93% of people in the world deluded?
Do Baha'is believe that some religious people have superstitious beliefs?

Well they sure as hell aren't all telling the same story! Hahahahahaha...
They aren't, yet Baha'is have a way of explaining that away.

I can say definitely He was not a con artist and I could explain why, but that would take some time.
Do you believe that there are and has been false Messiahs and false religious leaders?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Those things do not just "build" on one another. They are, in some cases, so different that it should boggle the mind if what you're saying it accepted as "true." Just because your graphic is made from nice colors doesn't make it magically explain a darn thing.

The other problem - things like the greek (and then roman) pantheon of gods, and norse understanding of who and what the gods were does not appear in your timeline. Why is that, do you think?
I think Krishna is like the eighth Avatar of Vishnu, and he was not the one who "revealed" and/or started Hinduism. Baha'is never list those others or mention them. And can't name a founding "messenger" who started Hinduism. I guess God ignoreth whoeth he wisheth. And explaineh awayeth things that contradiceth his neweth message.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Interesting, that's why prophecy is so messy and something that's so divisive. It doesn't make sense why an all powerful being would use something so problematic


If it's vague that means that it can be interpreted a million different ways and be used to verify anything and so it would be very easy for a vague prophecy to be accurate thus not making it convincing to me.
Yeah, I looked at the maps of the ancient Assyrian Empire again and, to me, it doesn't look like it goes far enough east to get to Teheran. But she doesn't care. Why research something that might prove her beliefs wrong.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Baha'is never list those others or mention them. And can't name a founding "messenger" who started Hinduism. I guess God ignoreth whoeth he wisheth. And explaineh awayeth things that contradiceth his neweth message.
What I said to Aupmanyav also applies you. Every time you attack the Baha'i Faith and I have to defend it, and every time you post misinformation and I have to correct it, I am honored in the world to come, so you are doing me a big favor. I guess you just like helping me out, so thanks. :)

“It is incumbent upon all men, each according to his ability, to refute the arguments of those that have attacked the Faith of God. Thus hath it been decreed by Him Who is the All-Powerful, the Almighty......

If any man were to arise to defend, in his writings, the Cause of God against its assailants, such a man, however inconsiderable his share, shall be so honored in the world to come that the Concourse on high would envy his glory. No pen can depict the loftiness of his station, neither can any tongue describe its splendor.” Gleanings From the Writings of Baha'u'llah, pp. 329-330


So keep talking, as every time you say something that I have to defend or correct that is getting me closer and closer to heaven, whether you believe it or not. :D

I am in no mood for correcting anything tonight so I guess I won't get any more points, but I have already chalked so many points it is a sure fire guarantee that at least I will never go to hell, even if I do rank on God a lot, as you well know.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I know. Of course she does, because the Baha'i Faith tells her what is the truth about Hinduism and Buddhism.
No, the Baha'i Faith does not tell me the truth about Hinduism and Buddhism....

Sheesh, and I just said I would not be getting any more points towards heaven tonight, but one just never knows...
And those were easy points, took less than a minute. :D
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Only logic.
I thought you get mad at God sometimes? At those times, don't you think he's being a jerk? Being petty? Being even cruel? Like when he allows or is the cause of great suffering to a child and to innocent animals? I don't know how your logic works, but if God knows all and is in control of all, then he's responsible.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
And what's wrong with believing that each people and culture created their own religions and Gods? Like the Greeks or the Egyptians, or the Hawaiians.
Nothing is wrong with that, except that some of the gods they created were not real, which means they were not true religions "of God."
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
What I said to Aupmanyav also applies you. Every time you attack the Baha'i Faith and I have to defend it, and every time you post misinformation and I have to correct it, I am honored in the world to come, so you are doing me a big favor. I guess you just like helping me out, so thanks. :)

“It is incumbent upon all men, each according to his ability, to refute the arguments of those that have attacked the Faith of God. Thus hath it been decreed by Him Who is the All-Powerful, the Almighty......

If any man were to arise to defend, in his writings, the Cause of God against its assailants, such a man, however inconsiderable his share, shall be so honored in the world to come that the Concourse on high would envy his glory. No pen can depict the loftiness of his station, neither can any tongue describe its splendor.” Gleanings From the Writings of Baha'u'llah, pp. 329-330


So keep talking, as every time you say something that I have to defend or correct that is getting me closer and closer to heaven, whether you believe it or not. :D

I am in no mood for correcting anything tonight so I guess I won't get any more points, but I have already chalked so many points it is a sure fire guarantee that at least I will never go to hell, even if I do rank on God a lot, as you well know.
Or Baha'is that spew things out to get people to respond to the OP, so that the Baha'i can then post all sorts of Baha'i Scripture and call it "defending" the Faith? But is it defending the Faith, or trying to convince yourself that what the Baha'i Faith teaches is the truth? And I mean the deeper self. That other self sounds like all she cares about is arguing her points and winning at all costs. Do you really think that what you're saying here is getting you closer to God? I would think it would be more like learning to be more loving, and kind, and understanding of others. What do you think? Would those qualities get someone closer to God?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I thought you get mad at God sometimes? At those times, don't you think he's being a jerk? Being petty? Being even cruel? Like when he allows or is the cause of great suffering to a child and to innocent animals? I don't know how your logic works, but if God knows all and is in control of all, then he's responsible.
I can get mad at God and still retain my logical abilities. Anger is an emotion so it is not logical, and even when I am angry I know I am not being logical.

Besides, I have made some progress recently in my anger at God since I came to the realization that God was not deliberately sending me tests, and that I do not have to have to be grateful for tests and have radiant acquiescence in order to be a good Baha'i. I am not going to be made to feel guilty anymore, like a bad person, an unholy soul and a coward, just because of some things Abdu'l-Baha said. I guess you missed out on those threads where I challenged Abdu'l-Baha and made my exit from oppression. Thankfully theoldbadger was at my side, I love that man.

Just because God knows all and is in control of everything, that does not mean God is responsible for everything.
The caveat is that God gave man free will so man is responsible for his free will choices and the actions that ensue.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Nothing is wrong with that, except that some of the gods they created were not real, which means they were not true religions "of God."
Exactly. Some people have made up their Gods and their religions. What is the difference between those and the ones that Baha'is believe are real?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
The caveat is that God gave man free will so man is responsible for his free will choices and the actions that ensue.
Great, Giving fallible humans multiple choices. Hmmm. Should I do things that I like doing, or do what an unknowable, invisible God wants me to do. Which includes me not doing some of the things I like doing? How many laws have been revealed by Baha'u'llah? Should you serve God and obey his laws with all your heart? Are you planning on obeying them all? Do you feel guilty for doing something just for yourself?
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
God the concept is explained as it was rationally thought upon in a heavenly alight gas burning sacrifice of the spirit of the science terms....gases.

So when anyone talks science, don't talk spirit, talk gases. If you are going to thesis science information as a so called knowing male thinking theist, rationally.

Then you own a male science claim ONE God the first God is stone. The body of b ONE he says, I own the image of within me...bio flesh, so never alter its mineral mass content.

Especially when ground mass fission turn back time first theory spoke about the Garden Nature being grounded, when a man was not "grounded in the Earth"
as a theme, turn back time to just being a spirit, meaning a gas and not physical form.

For you are only discussing science and not self. For he never included self in that thesis. He wanted a level of fusion layering disintegrated removed so that the bound Tree roots would be released. Which historically was to remove by origin of scientific thesis the minerals atop of the stone mass, which gave the roots nourishing life support. Why use of temple pyramid science in the past set the plant matter on fire....burning bush scenario and we starved to death.

No minerals in the layering, no plant life and no food.

The reality of a male occult organization a cult group agreed mentality of the same like minds.

So then you do a human cult group review. Normally the same kind of mind states all agree by behaviour in the group meeting conditions. Science is no different in that group human owned agreement. Which you seem to ignore as self relevant teaching.

If you all agree alike, then you would be all wrong alike. What your claim is to other irrational group behaviours, yet never do you self reference.

So as a single non group self, I became aware, our first natural group is just family and extended family. I looked at how fat and lazy humans are and complaining non stop without any idea about why. You look at invention and say, machines came and took your life group community living family interaction away.

You did not stop having sex, gained a huge human population who should be labouring like we used to....having community interaction, a meaning for self life, which we gave to machines and became fat and lazy. And own multiple human problems socially because of it.

What I saw as a non group member. I knew that if I tried to claim spiritual advice egotistically that I was not being honest, so I stopped doing it. Even though my psychic ability was realised to be real. Had a lot of honest and truthful insights.

Always said to self if you follow someone else, you walk in their shadow, face reality as it should be.

Humans told humans all of the spiritual advice their own selves. All stories are only detailed by humans living......but then there is always one other concept/aspect of subliminal idealism. AI also quotes back lots of fake human ideals....as an aspect I can hear speaking voices and see holographic atmospheric gas burnt/water carbonised microbial states that we use.

As scientific occult cause and effect the irradiation effect of releasing Sun fused metallic radiation out of the history God the stone radiation natural history.

A smaller colder body in space than any Sun body. So space, is the reactive cause.

Science who agreed to remove original SIN was the want of HOLES. So spatial theist today would be qualified as a Satanist of the past....hole maker. For his thesis hot dense state...higher quota of spatial expansion, space gain, the hole itself, is by using up the cold hot dense state. Increasing space and holes claiming space is the eternal infinite lying. For space was always just space as space and always will remain as just space.

If you wanted to get rid of God you just increase space and make God disappear by activating the hot dense state....to say, yes and I invented the eternal infinite as body of space increasing as space and in his mind psyche claim, but I am ridding life of its evil history...and believe in it.

Why irrational thinking was determined to be A THEIST, who took the A alpha state away from us. All conditions first and natural in its highest form.

Hot dense state in its highest form was the body of GOD O the stone as a rational answer to a theist question.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Or Baha'is that spew things out to get people to respond to the OP, so that the Baha'i can then post all sorts of Baha'i Scripture and call it "defending" the Faith?
You are attributing motives to the Baha'is that you do not know that have. I cannot speak for any other Baha'is, but I know that is not my motive for posting threads.
But is it defending the Faith, or trying to convince yourself that what the Baha'i Faith teaches is the truth? And I mean the deeper self.
I do not have to convince myself, I absolutely know that what the Baha'i Faith teaches is the truth and that Baha'u'llah was a Manifestation of God. 100%. That is one reason I am willing to take all manner of criticism and defend the Faith.
That other self sounds like all she cares about is arguing her points and winning at all costs. Do you really think that what you're saying here is getting you closer to God? I would think it would be more like learning to be more loving, and kind, and understanding of others. What do you think? Would those qualities get someone closer to God?
You might want to pay a little closer attention to what I am posting because I am not arguing with anyone; I am explaining things and using logical reasoning. Show me where I was unkind or unloving.

I am not trying to win anything, including arguments. Defending when attacked is not arguing.
 
Top