shawn001
Well-Known Member
It wouldn't look like anything. It would not even exist in the normal sense of that word. There was no time or space in which it could exist. I'm not saying anything much different than when scientists say the universe comes from "nothing". They don't really mean nothing in the normal sense of that word.
I'm not distinguishing between actuality and reality.
Virtual particles in Quantum foam.
"Let’s start with the origin of the universe. There is plenty of good scientific evidence that our universe began about 14 billion years ago, in a Big Bang of enormously high density and temperature, long before planets, stars and even atoms existed. But what came before? Krauss in his book discusses the current thinking of physicists that our entire universe could have emerged from a jitter in the amorphous haze of the subatomic world called the quantum foam, in which energy and matter can materialize out of nothing. (On the level of single subatomic particles, physicists have verified in the lab that such creation from “nothing” can occur.) Krauss’s punch line is that we do not need God to create the universe. The quantum foam can do it quite nicely all on its own. Aczel asks the obvious question: But where did the quantum foam come from? Where did the quantum laws come from? Hasn’t Krauss simply passed the buck? Legitimate questions. But ones we will probably never be able to answer."
Book review: ‘Why Science Does Not Disprove God’ by Amir D. Aczel - The Washington Post
NOTE: In physic's there is no such thing as NO-THING.
Actually we maybe able to answer them someday or at least some of them.