• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God did not create the Universe

Primordial Annihilator

Well-Known Member
Hi

I agree with you. I am trying to point out that the problem is fundamental to the nature of knowing. There actually cannot be any objective knowledge, with external senses and mind. For example objective knowledge is usually validated by control observations/experiments. Suppose, one may say that the knowledge 'Sun exists' is an objective knowledge since one sees it and another control person xyz also sees it. But these two observations -- of a) Sun existing and of b) the control person validating-- are actually by one person alone.

Om

Yes there is no objective unconnected observer within the universe.

Quite.

Which is why metaphysics will always be speculative.
 
Last edited:

Skeptisch

Well-Known Member
Nothing is real...even solid seeming matter is composed of atoms that themselves are composed of mostly empty space...
“Show me a cultural relativist at thirty thousand feet and I'll show you a hypocrite. Airplanes are built according to scientific principles and they work. They stay aloft and they get you to a chosen destination. Airplanes built to tribal or mythological specifications such as the dummy planes of the Cargo cults in jungle clearings or the bees-waxed wings of Icarus don't”.
RD
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
“Show me a cultural relativist at thirty thousand feet and I'll show you a hypocrite. Airplanes are built according to scientific principles and they work. They stay aloft and they get you to a chosen destination. Airplanes built to tribal or mythological specifications such as the dummy planes of the Cargo cults in jungle clearings or the bees-waxed wings of Icarus don't”.
RD
Science is a culture? I thought it was a methodology.

wa:do
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
Which is composed of energy, which is not composed of anything. There is reality down there, eventually.

Hi

Pure energy would not know itself or its effects. A knowledge mechanism is essential. Some use the term: sat (energy)-cit (intelligence)-ananda (joy more joyful than the joy itself).

...
 
Last edited:

PolyHedral

Superabacus Mystic
Knowledge is a recording. You only need an organizing mechanism to make a recording, not anything inherent to the universe.
 

Primordial Annihilator

Well-Known Member
“Show me a cultural relativist at thirty thousand feet and I'll show you a hypocrite. Airplanes are built according to scientific principles and they work. They stay aloft and they get you to a chosen destination. Airplanes built to tribal or mythological specifications such as the dummy planes of the Cargo cults in jungle clearings or the bees-waxed wings of Icarus don't”.
RD

You misunderstand me completely...nothing is real as there is no empirical reality to compare it with...no model of science can be compared with how things actually are...so everything we know is unreal modelling...abstract mathematical ideas...that are approximations of reality to varying degrees.

I am not saying science is 'wrong' because in fact it is at certain levels accurate enough for us to build microcomputers and super colliders...but as any particle physicist will tell you most of what you are taught about physics when young is abstract nonsense...the standard particle model for example is a highly inaccurate and increasingly convoluted model of what is actually going on at that level...(which causes even chemists to ponder the meaning behind what they do)..we turn now to M theory and membranes to guide us.
Eventually that will be replaced and so on until the very limit of our ability to sense and percieve...which is finite.

I am saying it can never be all knowing and all perceiving in any fundamentally empirical way.
 
Last edited:

PolyHedral

Superabacus Mystic
You misunderstand me completely.

I am not saying science is 'wrong' because in fact it is at certain levels accurate enough for us to build microcomputers and super colliders...but as any particle physicist will tell you most of what you are taught about physics when young is abstract nonsense...the standard particle model for example is highly inaccurate a model of what is actually going on...we turn now to M theory to guide us.
Eventually that will be replaced and so on until the very limit of our ability to sense and percieve...which is finite.

I am saying it can never be all knowing and all perceiving in any fundamentally empirical way.
But the actual mechanics underlying the universe are only finitely complex. Science can't be all-knowing, but it can be an arbitrarily close approximation.
Chaos is the final reality...from chaos comes all order.

Oi reckons..
So how is it that M theory, which is entirely ordered, predicts it perfectly?
 

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
What I call Chaos has to be in my view far more than I think it is.

I'm not sure what you mean by this.

Regardless of what exists -- regardless of whether we know what it is -- if it exists, then it is what it is. Do you agree?

Anything that exists must exist as what it is, else it wouldn't be that and rather something else. Right?

So, "Anything that exists, exists as what it is" is an absolute metaphysical truth. Even if we don't know "what" exists, we can know that if anything exists then it exists as what it is.
 
Top