I waited for a while for the simple answer to the simple question, that is related to the subject in science "Pain Principles" that stated "Nociceptors are free (bare) nerve endings found in the skin", which I gave a link to at the university of Texas:
And this is the verse that state feeling in the skin:
4:56
Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the fire. Once their skins are consumed, We replace them with other ones, so they may feel the punishment. God is the powerful, and Wise.
According to the university of Texas " Master List of Logical Fallacies":
Personal attack, Argument from Silence;"Science can tell us nothing about God. That proves God doesn't exist.", Playing on Emotions, They're Not Like Us, and Changing the subject, etc. .
I only listed the ones I felt relevant to what is being said in this thread, as respond to this the Question:
If you were to remove the "Nociceptors" from your skin, do you still feel the pain in the skin?. Yes or No.
Why can't the question be answered ?, because there are only two options for the answer; either they feel, or they don't, if they say, yes, they contradict science, and that proves them wrong, if they say, No, they prove my points. so the only alternative is to commit a fallacy in argument, or avoid answering the question, and this is what happened.
So I will recap the Facts that I presented:
1- Quran stated that the skin is replaced so they can feel the punishment, and science asserted this to be true. No one was able to contradict the science or the verse on , if "Nociceptors" are removed, the pain will not be felt in the skin. So the point stands
2- It is not in the human nature to know what doesn't exist. it is easy to refute that, by just telling me what I will post next, word for word. this is should be easy if that is in your nature. So the point stands.
3- science in the link I provided, asserted this specific knowledge about pain in the skin due to the "Nociceptors" are of recent discovery. so the knowledge about this,is not known at the time of the prophet. this point stands as well.
So the conclusion that the above facts lead to, is that if not in human nature to know that, it is not known at that time, and science assert this to be true, then one must conclude some being other than the human must had known that.
That being we call God. so God exists.
The verse is in the Quran, so the Quran must be from him.
A man has brought up this Quran, so this man must be his Messenger.
This settles the case.