Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you one of those people who insists that the big bang came from nothing?If God created existence, then logic follows that God doesn't exist.
No.Are you one of those people who insists that the big bang came from nothing?
Pan-deists believe in the exact opposite. That God died when it created the Universe, and became the Universe. But I like to think your version of events is true instead.What if the big bang was also god's birth?
But if god exists, how does he destroy existence without destroying himself?God destroys and creates existence in a never ending cycle.
Right, he destroys and creates himself aka existenceBut if god exists, how does he destroy existence without destroying himself?
One and the same. Everything that exists should be part of spacetime and thus the universeI think it's important to make a distinction between 'universe' and 'existence.' I think we're conflating the two terms here.
The universe is an appearance within existence. The universe is temporary and ever changing. Existence is immutable.One and the same. Everything that exists should be part of spacetime and thus the universe
That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.One and the same. Everything that exists should be part of spacetime and thus the universe
Interestingly, one could create a falsifiable model of God if we assume that Heaven existed eternally before our finite universe and that our spatio-temporal dimensions split off from Heaven's. Heaven would then literally exist in higher dimensions adjacent to the ones we inhabit.That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.
It used to be the case in physics that idd the universe = existence.
Now, they use another term for "all of existence": the cosmos.
The universe is part of the cosmos but not necessarily all of the cosmos.
The universe is an appearance within existence. The universe is temporary and ever changing. Existence is immutable.
But what is more than all of space and all of time?That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.
It used to be the case in physics that idd the universe = existence.
Now, they use another term for "all of existence": the cosmos.
The universe is part of the cosmos but not necessarily all of the cosmos.
If we define existence as a physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon we might satisfy the possibility of a god or gods.If God created existence, then logic follows that God doesn't exist.
We don't.If we define existence as a physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon we might satisfy the possibility of a god or gods.
My " If we define existence as a physical phenomenon, etc" was only a suggestion, a premise for the purpose of discussion. Your definition is a declaration of Theistic belief unless I misunderstand it.....I don't enjoy that luxury.We don't.
sa...
I define existence as the substrate on which physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon appear.
My definition does not necessarily declare theistic belief. Yes, gods exists for many, yet for others they do not exist, and yet others are uncertain if they exist. So it could declare atheistic or agnostic belief (or lack thereof).Your definition is a declaration of Theistic belief unless I misunderstand it.....I don't enjoy that luxury.
Thank You for the additional information........My definition does not necessarily declare theistic belief. Yes, gods exists for many, yet for others they do not exist, and yet others are uncertain if they exist. So it could declare atheistic or agnostic belief (or lack thereof).