• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God first

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
After careful deliberation I've decided to believe abiogenesis happened. As I believe that evolution took place it only makes sense. I do believe that God created all of existence first though. Rock on!
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I think it's important to make a distinction between 'universe' and 'existence.' I think we're conflating the two terms here.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
I think it's important to make a distinction between 'universe' and 'existence.' I think we're conflating the two terms here.
One and the same. Everything that exists should be part of spacetime and thus the universe
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
One and the same. Everything that exists should be part of spacetime and thus the universe
That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.

It used to be the case in physics that idd the universe = existence.
Now, they use another term for "all of existence": the cosmos.

The universe is part of the cosmos but not necessarily all of the cosmos.
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
In my opinion, that's pretty cool that you're willing to change your position in accordance with new data and argumentation. That's a great habit to have.

I also think abiogenesis itself is interesting. Have you heard of Particle Life? It's a sandbox sim that illustrates how complex structures can emerge from simplicity. Here's a 17 minute video about it, for anyone who's interested.


No, I don't seriously believe anyone is going to watch a 17 minute video on a minimalist indie sim game that I link to, but I think it's neat so I'm sharing it on the off-chance someone else finds it as interesting as I do.
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.

It used to be the case in physics that idd the universe = existence.
Now, they use another term for "all of existence": the cosmos.

The universe is part of the cosmos but not necessarily all of the cosmos.
Interestingly, one could create a falsifiable model of God if we assume that Heaven existed eternally before our finite universe and that our spatio-temporal dimensions split off from Heaven's. Heaven would then literally exist in higher dimensions adjacent to the ones we inhabit.

The existence of such dimensions, especially a second temporal dimension that stretches back eternally, are not only within the realm of possibility but they would have measurable effects on the universe we observe.

I don't think such a Heaven exists, but it would make for interesting science fiction.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
The universe is an appearance within existence. The universe is temporary and ever changing. Existence is immutable.

That is, unless a multi-verse also exists.

It used to be the case in physics that idd the universe = existence.
Now, they use another term for "all of existence": the cosmos.

The universe is part of the cosmos but not necessarily all of the cosmos.
But what is more than all of space and all of time?
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
If we define existence as a physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon we might satisfy the possibility of a god or gods.
We don't.

I define existence as the substrate on which physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon appear.
 

Stonetree

Abducted Member
Premium Member
We don't.
sa...
I define existence as the substrate on which physical phenomenon and god or gods as a spiritual phenomenon appear.
My " If we define existence as a physical phenomenon, etc" was only a suggestion, a premise for the purpose of discussion. Your definition is a declaration of Theistic belief unless I misunderstand it.....I don't enjoy that luxury.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
Your definition is a declaration of Theistic belief unless I misunderstand it.....I don't enjoy that luxury.
My definition does not necessarily declare theistic belief. Yes, gods exists for many, yet for others they do not exist, and yet others are uncertain if they exist. So it could declare atheistic or agnostic belief (or lack thereof).
 

Stonetree

Abducted Member
Premium Member
My definition does not necessarily declare theistic belief. Yes, gods exists for many, yet for others they do not exist, and yet others are uncertain if they exist. So it could declare atheistic or agnostic belief (or lack thereof).
Thank You for the additional information........
 
Top