God is only one

[firedragon]

I take it you can't actually address the issue then, judging by the efforts you are taking to avoid it.

I know you were looking for an ad hominem opportunity. But I have already explained it in the OP so you can read and understand. The first cause is only leading to a first cause. The philosophical arguments for the nature of this first cause is a different thought process.

If you want to end with another ad hominem its alright with me. Thanks for your response.

 

[rational experiences]

The human teaching against science a human choice said no prophets hence no predictions in science before one God planet earth.

Became an agreement. After the prophet prediction was realised. Papers were rewritten documents.

As it owned the history heavens first.

Other bodies only affected the heavens.

Sun.
Radiations mass.
Asteroid sun stone.
Ice upon asteroid.
Moon asteroid. Cause effects said science. Not predictable.

History tells us that science updated was not actually historic Muslim welcomed as the basis of their creation attack life thesis was a prediction. Prophet. Asteroid rock that fell.

The agreement in science rock was a founding idealism satanic versus Christ inheritance wandering star saviour or destroyer.

Was then agreed. One God only.

1000 year prediction.
Christ 1000.
Satan. 1000
M 1000.

English update.

In vision with a speaking warning the status said the English meaning was a new written bible teaching had tried to stop Hitler. Was not successful.

My warnings female. The warning message I gained as a dream.

0 AD God earth pressure changed caused in science.

Then Rome was attacked burnt Satan star fall burning rock. Nero.

The variable of a Christ cold gas released star to a Satan star.

1000 years later Satan star burning shroud victim proof. Satan came.

1901 Russia hit.

Christ star was meant to be inherited year 2000. To end earths irradiation carbon released by incoming burning stone inherited since. Constantly arriving. Falling.

Rome said old Mayan 2012 end time would not be met. Zero Hebrew Jehovah prediction no longer existed. Old science testimonies of man.

Baha'i notification updated the Roman status. Men who star watched as a science.

So man agreed to never repractice nuclear earths unsealing again. Had to fight to own control of the prevention of the rebuilding of Jerusalem's science temple. Another proof.

As they knew space zero vacuum had become abominated. New Passing asteroids in the earth vicinity are ignited to burn. Returning.

The status known causes.

Fast swift moving earth attacks are then activated.

The agreement was about life continuance on earth as a known science caused condition inherited causes.

It was a real teaching forgotten in the teaching practice. As irradiated heavy metal brain mind conditions changes human intelligence and behaviours.

The dark ages warning.

 

[Tiberius]

I know you were looking for an ad hominem opportunity.

Me pointing out that you have not addressed the issue I raised is not an ad hominem.

But I have already explained it in the OP so you can read and understand.

Given that the opening post of this thread was Meandflower, and not by you, I don't see how YOU could have explained anything at all in the OP.

If you want to end with another ad hominem its alright with me. Thanks for your response.

I haven't used any ad hominems.

 

[firedragon]

Me pointing out that you have not addressed the issue I raised is not an ad hominem.

No. you put it very mildly now.

Addressing me and my intentions without even attempting to address the argument of the OP is ad hominem.

 

[Tiberius]

No. you put it very mildly now.

Addressing me and my intentions without even attempting to address the argument of the OP is ad hominem.

And yet you still avoid saying whether you think the First Cause argument is a valid argument for a God, deity of some kind, creator being, etc.

 

[firedragon]

And yet you still avoid saying whether you think the First Cause argument is a valid argument for a God

Open a new thread. It is out of the scope of this OP if you read it again.

Now next post, try to avoid an ad hominem.

 

[Tiberius]

Open a new thread. It is out of the scope of this OP if you read it again.

Now next post, try to avoid an ad hominem.

Again, I have not used an ad hominem. But I shall start a thread to discuss the validity of the First Cause argument.

Is the First Cause argument Valid?

 

[firedragon]

Again, I have not used an ad hominem. But I shall start a thread to discuss the validity of the First Cause argument.

Is the First Cause argument Valid?

Again, ad hominem is to address or discredit the person without addressing the argument presented. Thats all you have attempted to do.

Thanks.

 

[Tiberius]

Again, ad hominem is to address or discredit the person without addressing the argument presented. Thats all you have attempted to do.

Thanks.

And where did I do that to you? Please, quote the actual post where I did that.