• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God is simple, not complex

outhouse

Atheistically
lack a basic understanding of philosophical theology.

Non sequitur to our discussion here. Philosophical theology only exist in a classroom


Obviously, atheists do not have a basic understanding of the doctrine of divine simplicity

What is there to understand outside the wiki link? Nothing is substantiated, and nothing in that personal opinion can or does apply to the definition of the god concept.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
The concept of god factually evolved with time.

The concept factually changed form one culture to the next.

There is no such thing as "the" god.... All gods to date evolved in a religion, and each defined it differently.

There is no such thing as one god to humanity as a whole. One god only exist to certain people in certain geographic locations.
You're making this extremely easy.

God is not the concept of god.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Requests for "proof" are a conversation stopper, because there is no proof of anything ontological. If you want to continue the discussion, allow leeway.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Your call. You're the one asking.

First of all. Lets pick one god and look at how only man defines the concept.

You want to go back to the origin? Lest look at how the Abrahamic god was born in mythology.

. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ancient_Israel_and_Judah

At an early stage El and Yahweh became fused

So here we see Israelites defining the monotheistic god from two deities. They compiled the two together.

We also know King Josiah was a loyal Yahwist and had the bible redacted to monotheism. So a political decision made the one god concept.

We see some early Israelites as early as 800BC attributing Els divinity to Yahweh including Asherah Els wife, now viewed as Yahwehs wife.

Monotheism was not even fully accepted by all Israelites until roughly 200-400 BC .
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Requests for "proof" are a conversation stopper, because there is no proof of anything ontological.

Here is the kicker! we are not debating something ontological.


We are debating different peoples definitions of what the god concept means to them.
 

Reflex

Active Member
Correct. Do you think he was calling a member an idiot just to do it or was it an extension of his dismissal of the post?
Read again what I said. I said the post was idiotic, especially given all the prior information that was, apparently, either not read or simply not understood.
I just use "god" all the time now. It's an extra key-stroke to capitalize it.
It's more than just an extra keystroke, but a way to designate the ontological distinction between Ultimate Reality, if you will, and (real or imagined) demiurges, like Santa or the FSM. Hinduism, too, make a similar distinction.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
First of all. Lets pick one god and look at how only man defines the concept.
Let's look at definition, and realise how only man defines anything and everything, real or concept.

You want to go back to the origin? Lest look at how the Abrahamic god was born in mythology.

. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ancient_Israel_and_Judah

At an early stage El and Yahweh became fused

So here we see Israelites defining the monotheistic god from two deities. They compiled the two together.

We also know King Josiah was a loyal Yahwist and had the bible redacted to monotheism. So a political decision made the one god concept.

We see some early Israelites as early as 800BC attributing Els divinity to Yahweh including Asherah Els wife, now viewed as Yahwehs wife.

Monotheism was not even fully accepted by all Israelites until roughly 200-400 BC .
Yes. Joseph Campbell already taught about similarities of motif amongst mythological traditions.

He also noted a god.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
It's more than just an extra keystroke, but a way to designate the ontological distinction between Ultimate Reality, if you will, and (real or imagined) demiurges, like Santa or the FSM. Hinduism, too, make a similar distinction.
The image of the Ultimate Reality and the image of the demigod are both images.
 

Reflex

Active Member
The image of the Ultimate Reality and the image of the demigod are both images.
Yeah....that's the problem with words: they are misleading because they operate in the realm of imaged ideas. But reality, or in this instance what I called "Ultimate Reality," is not a concept. I think you understand that.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Then what are you expecting proof of?

We have plenty of mythological proof. We see god being defined willy nilly in ancient times in only mythological terms.

God more or less amounts to ones positive and good thoughts one has in his conscious mind, because these primitive people did not think a person could make his own decisions.

If one had many good thoughts and spoke of god he was a prophet plain and simple.

Kings and Emperors defined gods, groups of common men wrote and defined god and later people in power redefined that concept.


What Am I expecting when someone claims their god exist outside of mythology? something outside mythology!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


But instead what we actually see, is god described a thousand different ways under the premise of 3 major definition changes in the 3 Abrahamic religions, and every last one of those was man made.
 
Top