Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Skip the term "Jungian"--that's an almost certain moonbat attractor.
Are you looking more at the analytical aspects, or the Archetype symbolism?
Oy, that makes it pretty rough. The Archetype thing is the part that really draws the new agers, and on that particular aspect, Jung was pretty new-agey himself.For right now, archetypal. I never really understood the depth of the concept until very recently and am looking for deeper information than damn wikipedia.
Oy, that makes it pretty rough. The Archetype thing is the part that really draws the new agers, and on that particular aspect, Jung was pretty new-agey himself.
I actually recommend James Hillman more than Jung on the concepts of archetypal psychology. He's got several books out that should be available at a local library or through ILL.